PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDEF vs. GCAD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDEF vs. GCAD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (IDEF) and Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEF achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than GCAD's 17.90% return.


IDEF

1D
-0.60%
1M
-3.83%
YTD
2.45%
6M
0.08%
1Y
16.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GCAD

1D
-0.80%
1M
4.43%
YTD
17.90%
6M
15.75%
1Y
37.12%
3Y*
34.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEF vs. GCAD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IDEF and GCAD is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2025

0.85

The correlation between IDEF and GCAD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDEF vs. GCAD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDEF
GCAD

Industrials

85.4%
77.7%

Technology

11.7%
2.9%

Energy

1.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.5%
0.7%

Utilities

0.3%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Industrials

IDEF
85.4%
GCAD
77.7%

Technology

IDEF
11.7%
GCAD
2.9%

Energy

IDEF
1.0%
GCAD

-

Basic Materials

IDEF
0.5%
GCAD
0.7%

Utilities

IDEF
0.3%
GCAD

-

Financial Services

IDEF
0.1%
GCAD

-

Communication Services

IDEF
0.0%
GCAD

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDEF

-

GCAD
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

IDEF

-

GCAD

-

Healthcare

IDEF

-

GCAD

-

Real Estate

IDEF

-

GCAD
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDEF vs. GCAD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDEF
IDEF Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

GCAD
GCAD Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GCAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCAD Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GCAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCAD Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDEF vs. GCAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (IDEF) and Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDEFGCADDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.32

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

2.49

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.57

8.52

-5.95

IDEF vs. GCAD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the GCAD Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDEF and GCAD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDEF vs. GCAD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEF drawdown since its inception was -14.78%, smaller than the maximum GCAD drawdown of -16.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEF and GCAD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDEFGCADDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.78%

-16.14%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

-14.96%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.23%

-2.79%

-11.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.30%

-3.01%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.28%

4.37%

+1.91%

Volatility

IDEF vs. GCAD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (IDEF) and Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD) have volatilities of 8.84% and 8.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDEFGCADDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.84%

8.50%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.93%

17.61%

+1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.10%

20.36%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.57%

18.76%

+2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

18.76%

+2.81%

IDEF vs. GCAD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEF has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GCAD's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDEF vs. GCAD - Dividend Comparison

IDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than GCAD's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GCAD
Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF
1.75%2.06%4.94%3.62%
IDEF
iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF
0.34%0.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDEF and GCAD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDEF has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to GCAD (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEF dropped -14.78% vs GCAD's -16.14%.

On 1-year performance, GCAD leads with 37.12% vs 16.11% for IDEF. On fees, GCAD is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, GCAD has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GCAD has performed better with a 37.12% return vs 16.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GCAD is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IDEF.

GCAD has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.34% for IDEF.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IDEF and 0.00% for GCAD.

GCAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDEF and GCAD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer