IDCC vs. META

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

IDCC (InterDigital, Inc.) and META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Communication Services sector — IDCC in Telecom Services, META in Internet Content & Information. Over the past 10 years, IDCC returned 18.69%/yr vs 19.06%/yr for META. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IDCC vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDCC achieves a -16.22% return, which is significantly lower than META's 1.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IDCC having a 18.69% annualized return and META not far ahead at 19.06%.

IDCC

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -4.01%
• 6M: -13.70%
• YTD: -16.22%
• 1Y: 18.65%
• 3Y*: 42.33%
• 5Y*: 32.45%
• 10Y*: 18.69%

META

• 1D: 5.97%
• 1M: 17.84%
• 6M: 2.66%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 1Y: -6.43%
• 3Y*: 31.29%
• 5Y*: 14.01%
• 10Y*: 19.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDCC vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IDCC InterDigital, Inc.	-16.22%	66.05%	81.06%	123.67%	-29.25%	20.49%	14.28%	-16.11%	-11.23%	-15.34%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	1.56%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IDCC and META is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012	0.35

The correlation between IDCC and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap IDCC : $6.85B META : $1.70T
EPS IDCC : $10.37 META : $27.47
PE Ratio IDCC : 25.53 META : 24.37
PEG Ratio IDCC : 0.32 META : 1.00
PS Ratio IDCC : 11.29 META : 8.00
PB Ratio IDCC : 8.46 META : 7.04
Total Revenue (TTM) IDCC : $828.92M META : $214.96B
Gross Profit (TTM) IDCC : $537.64M META : $176.14B
EBITDA (TTM) IDCC : $508.15M META : $106.31B

Return for Risk

IDCC vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDCC

IDCC Risk / Return Rank: 56
IDCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
IDCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
IDCC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
IDCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
IDCC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 35
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
META Omega Ratio Rank: 33
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
META Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDCC vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IDCC	META	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	-0.20	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.82	-0.03	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.00	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.46	-0.23	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.98	-0.44	+1.42

IDCC vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDCC Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDCC and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IDCC vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDCC drawdown since its inception was -93.83%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCC and META.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDCC	META	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.83%	-76.74%	-17.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.48%	-33.30%	-3.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.48%	-34.15%	-2.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.99%	-76.74%	+31.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.94%	-76.74%	+11.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.73%	-15.01%	-17.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.24%	-15.88%	-29.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.00%	17.46%	-0.46%

Volatility

IDCC vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) is 13.08%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 16.03%. This indicates that IDCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDCC	META	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.08%	16.03%	-2.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.85%	30.87%	+4.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.56%	38.42%	+9.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.90%	44.53%	-8.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.60%	38.96%	-3.36%

Dividends

IDCC vs. META - Dividend Comparison

IDCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than META's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDCC InterDigital, Inc.	1.06%	0.74%	0.85%	1.34%	2.83%	1.95%	2.31%	2.57%	2.11%	1.64%	0.99%	1.63%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.31%	0.32%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

IDCC vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between InterDigital, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

IDCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, InterDigital, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 205.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

IDCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, InterDigital, Inc. reported an operating income of 82.26M and revenue of 205.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.1%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

IDCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, InterDigital, Inc. reported a net income of 75.33M and revenue of 205.42M, resulting in a net margin of 36.7%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDCC and META in my portfolio?

IDCC and META have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDCC or META?

META has higher volatility (16.03%) compared to IDCC (13.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDCC dropped -93.83% vs META's -76.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.