IDCC vs. META
IDCC (InterDigital, Inc.) and META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Communication Services sector — IDCC in Telecom Services, META in Internet Content & Information. Over the past 10 years, IDCC returned 19.88%/yr vs 16.39%/yr for META. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
IDCC vs. META - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDCC achieves a -3.59% return, which is significantly higher than META's -15.51% return. Over the past 10 years, IDCC has outperformed META with an annualized return of 19.88%, while META has yielded a comparatively lower 16.39% annualized return.
IDCC
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 8.27%
- 6M
- -6.18%
- YTD
- -3.59%
- 1Y
- 19.13%
- 3Y*
- 50.69%
- 5Y*
- 38.04%
- 10Y*
- 19.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.24%
META
- 1D
- 3.28%
- 1M
- -9.17%
- 6M
- -22.16%
- YTD
- -15.51%
- 1Y
- -27.79%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- 16.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $77.97M | $73.83M | $99.53M | |
| $9.87B | $11.79B | $10.93B |
IDCC vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDCC InterDigital, Inc. | -3.59% | 66.05% | 81.06% | 123.67% | -29.25% | 20.49% | 14.28% | -16.11% | -11.23% | -15.34% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -15.51% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDCC and META is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012 | 0.35 |
The correlation between IDCC and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IDCC:
$7.88B
META:
$1.42T
IDCC:
$8.62
META:
$26.51
IDCC:
35.36
META:
21.00
IDCC:
0.44
META:
0.86
IDCC:
13.55
META:
6.27
IDCC:
8.69
META:
5.47
IDCC:
$788.50M
META:
$228.25B
IDCC:
$674.42M
META:
$186.59B
IDCC:
$433.16M
META:
$107.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDCC vs. META — Risk / Return Rank
IDCC
META
IDCC vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDCC | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.89 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | -0.84 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.02 | -1.52 | +2.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDCC vs. META - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDCC drawdown since its inception was -93.83%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCC and META.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDCC | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.83% | -76.74% | -17.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.48% | -33.30% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.48% | -34.15% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.99% | -76.74% | +31.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.94% | -76.74% | +11.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.59% | -29.30% | +6.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.22% | -15.90% | -29.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.74% | 18.25% | +0.49% |
Volatility
IDCC vs. META - Volatility Comparison
InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) has a higher volatility of 16.62% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 15.37%. This indicates that IDCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDCC | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.62% | 15.37% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.73% | 30.29% | +8.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.19% | 39.78% | +9.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.62% | 44.68% | -8.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.98% | 39.10% | -3.12% |
Dividends
IDCC vs. META - Dividend Comparison
IDCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than META's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDCC InterDigital, Inc. | 0.92% | 0.74% | 0.85% | 1.34% | 2.83% | 1.95% | 2.31% | 2.57% | 2.11% | 1.64% | 0.99% | 1.63% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.38% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
IDCC vs. META - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between InterDigital, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IDCC vs. META - Profitability Comparison
IDCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, InterDigital, Inc. reported a gross profit of 260.17M and revenue of 260.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
META - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 49.47B and revenue of 60.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.
IDCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, InterDigital, Inc. reported an operating income of 139.24M and revenue of 260.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.5%.
META - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.78B and revenue of 60.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.
IDCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, InterDigital, Inc. reported a net income of 116.37M and revenue of 260.17M, resulting in a net margin of 44.7%.
META - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 15.85B and revenue of 60.80B, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IDCC and META have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDCC has higher volatility (16.62%) compared to META (15.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDCC dropped -93.83% vs META's -76.74%.
IDCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDCC and META
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer