PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDCC vs. LLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IDCC vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDCC achieves a -3.59% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's 7.26% return. Over the past 10 years, IDCC has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 19.88%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 32.12% annualized return.


IDCC

1D
0.49%
1M
8.27%
6M
-6.18%
YTD
-3.59%
1Y
19.13%
3Y*
50.69%
5Y*
38.04%
10Y*
19.88%
ALL TIME*
12.24%

LLY

1D
-0.53%
1M
-3.60%
6M
11.14%
YTD
7.26%
1Y
56.33%
3Y*
37.33%
5Y*
37.67%
10Y*
32.12%
ALL TIME*
16.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$77.97M$73.83M$99.53M
$2.62B$2.84B$3.35B

IDCC vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDCC
InterDigital, Inc.
-3.59%66.05%81.06%123.67%-29.25%20.49%14.28%-16.11%-11.23%-15.34%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
7.26%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%31.04%16.14%40.45%17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IDCC and LLY is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.15

The correlation between IDCC and LLY shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.15 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IDCC:

$7.88B

LLY:

$1.08T

EPS

IDCC:

$8.62

LLY:

$28.16

PE Ratio

IDCC:

35.36

LLY:

40.80

PEG Ratio

IDCC:

0.44

LLY:

0.82

PS Ratio

IDCC:

13.55

LLY:

14.27

PB Ratio

IDCC:

8.69

LLY:

32.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

IDCC:

$788.50M

LLY:

$72.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IDCC:

$674.42M

LLY:

$59.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

IDCC:

$433.16M

LLY:

$32.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDCC vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IDCC
IDCC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IDCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDCC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
IDCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDCC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IDCC vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDCCLLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.28

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

2.44

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.02

6.60

-5.58

IDCC vs. LLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDCC Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDCC and LLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDCC vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDCC drawdown since its inception was -93.83%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCC and LLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDCCLLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.83%

-68.24%

-25.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.48%

-23.18%

-13.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.48%

-34.48%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.99%

-34.48%

-10.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.94%

-34.48%

-30.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.59%

-7.02%

-15.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.22%

-19.17%

-26.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.74%

8.56%

+10.18%

Volatility

IDCC vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) has a higher volatility of 16.62% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 8.88%. This indicates that IDCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDCCLLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.62%

8.88%

+7.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.73%

27.69%

+11.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.19%

38.37%

+10.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.62%

32.64%

+3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.98%

30.37%

+5.61%

Dividends

IDCC vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

IDCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than LLY's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDCC
InterDigital, Inc.
0.92%0.74%0.85%1.34%2.83%1.95%2.31%2.57%2.11%1.64%0.99%1.63%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.56%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%

Financials

IDCC vs. LLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between InterDigital, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

IDCC vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between InterDigital, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

IDCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, InterDigital, Inc. reported a gross profit of 260.17M and revenue of 260.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

LLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 15.64B and revenue of 19.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

IDCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, InterDigital, Inc. reported an operating income of 139.24M and revenue of 260.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.5%.

LLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 9.19B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.4%.

IDCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, InterDigital, Inc. reported a net income of 116.37M and revenue of 260.17M, resulting in a net margin of 44.7%.

LLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IDCC and LLY have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDCC has higher volatility (16.62%) compared to LLY (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDCC dropped -93.83% vs LLY's -68.24%.

LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDCC and LLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer