PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDBT.L vs. IUIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDBT.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IDBT.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDBT.L achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 17.06% return. Over the past 10 years, IDBT.L has underperformed IUIT.L with an annualized return of 1.76%, while IUIT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 25.50% annualized return.


IDBT.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.15%
6M
0.76%
YTD
0.76%
1Y
3.38%
3Y*
4.30%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
1.76%

IUIT.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
-2.95%
6M
19.62%
YTD
17.06%
1Y
31.65%
3Y*
29.24%
5Y*
21.03%
10Y*
25.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDBT.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDBT.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
0.76%5.28%4.03%4.16%-3.71%-0.64%3.13%3.67%1.34%0.33%
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
17.06%22.93%38.51%59.45%-29.15%34.09%43.14%48.83%-1.41%37.94%

Correlation

The correlation between IDBT.L and IUIT.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015

-0.11

The correlation between IDBT.L and IUIT.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.02 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDBT.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDBT.L
IDBT.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IDBT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDBT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDBT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IDBT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDBT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

IUIT.L
IUIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDBT.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IDBT.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDBT.LIUIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.25

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

1.85

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.88

4.97

+11.91

IDBT.L vs. IUIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDBT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDBT.L and IUIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDBT.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDBT.L drawdown since its inception was -5.66%, smaller than the maximum IUIT.L drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDBT.L and IUIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDBT.LIUIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-33.46%

+27.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.72%

-17.03%

+16.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.97%

-26.40%

+25.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.66%

-33.46%

+27.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.66%

-33.46%

+27.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.85%

+7.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-5.91%

+5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

6.35%

-6.16%

Volatility

IDBT.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IDBT.L) is 0.39%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that IDBT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDBT.LIUIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.39%

7.15%

-6.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.92%

17.59%

-16.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21%

22.08%

-20.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.99%

23.96%

-21.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.77%

22.32%

-20.55%

IDBT.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDBT.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDBT.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison

IDBT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, while IUIT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDBT.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
3.99%4.15%4.25%2.97%0.74%0.63%1.71%2.31%1.57%0.96%0.74%0.51%
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDBT.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IDBT.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDBT.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUIT.L.

IDBT.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. IDBT.L tracks iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IDBT.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDBT.L and IUIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer