PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICVT vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICVT vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICVT achieves a 26.89% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.99% return.


ICVT

1D
0.02%
1M
5.09%
YTD
26.89%
6M
24.71%
1Y
43.39%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
14.40%

IBID

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.08%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICVT vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
26.89%18.10%10.61%5.09%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
1.99%5.66%4.71%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ICVT and IBID is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.03

The correlation between ICVT and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICVT vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICVT
ICVT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ICVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ICVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICVT vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICVTIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.75

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.78

8.22

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.71

30.99

-11.28

ICVT vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICVT Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICVT and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICVT vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICVT drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICVT and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICVTIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.25%

-1.28%

-31.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.55%

-0.49%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.49%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

-0.22%

-9.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

0.13%

+2.08%

Volatility

ICVT vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that ICVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICVTIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

0.35%

+6.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

0.86%

+12.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.57%

1.23%

+14.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

2.24%

+11.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.61%

2.24%

+13.37%

ICVT vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICVT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ICVT vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

ICVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than IBID's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.68%4.43%4.24%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
1.28%1.73%2.19%1.85%1.93%7.70%3.98%1.86%4.82%2.56%3.06%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICVT and IBID have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICVT has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICVT dropped -33.25% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, ICVT leads with 43.39% vs 4.04% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ICVT has performed better with a 43.39% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ICVT.

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.28% for ICVT.

ICVT is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ICVT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ICVT and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICVT and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer