PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICSU.L vs. VUAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICSU.L vs. VUAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ICSU.L is traded in GBp, while VUAG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUAG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICSU.L achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than VUAG.L's 10.56% return.


ICSU.L

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
6.60%
6M
5.01%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*

VUAG.L

1D
0.06%
1M
4.52%
YTD
10.56%
6M
9.91%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
14.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICSU.L vs. VUAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ICSU.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
6.60%-3.20%16.26%-5.83%11.78%19.63%5.64%6.54%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
10.56%9.36%27.33%19.67%-8.88%30.97%201.05%9.30%

Correlation

The correlation between ICSU.L and VUAG.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019

0.47

The correlation between ICSU.L and VUAG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ICSU.L vs. VUAG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ICSU.L
VUAG.L

Consumer Defensive

99.0%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
10.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.7%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Consumer Defensive

ICSU.L
99.0%
VUAG.L
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ICSU.L
1.0%
VUAG.L
10.2%

Basic Materials

ICSU.L

-

VUAG.L
1.8%

Communication Services

ICSU.L

-

VUAG.L
11.3%

Energy

ICSU.L

-

VUAG.L
3.5%

Financial Services

ICSU.L

-

VUAG.L
11.6%

Healthcare

ICSU.L

-

VUAG.L
8.5%

Industrials

ICSU.L

-

VUAG.L
8.3%

Real Estate

ICSU.L

-

VUAG.L
1.9%

Technology

ICSU.L

-

VUAG.L
35.7%

Utilities

ICSU.L

-

VUAG.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICSU.L vs. VUAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICSU.L
ICSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ICSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

VUAG.L
VUAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICSU.L vs. VUAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICSU.LVUAG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.51

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

4.08

-3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.82

14.96

-14.14

ICSU.L vs. VUAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICSU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICSU.L and VUAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICSU.LVUAG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

2.73

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

1.04

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.90

-0.42

Drawdowns

ICSU.L vs. VUAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICSU.L drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, smaller than the maximum VUAG.L drawdown of -25.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSU.L and VUAG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICSU.LVUAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-25.61%

+7.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-7.11%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.59%

-20.88%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.70%

-20.88%

+7.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.40%

-0.22%

-7.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-3.51%

-1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

1.94%

+1.93%

Volatility

ICSU.L vs. VUAG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that ICSU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICSU.LVUAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

2.62%

+3.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.97%

7.17%

+4.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

10.62%

+3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.45%

14.32%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.31%

36.09%

-21.78%

ICSU.L vs. VUAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICSU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAG.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ICSU.L vs. VUAG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ICSU.L nor VUAG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ICSU.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%71.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICSU.L and VUAG.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUAG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ICSU.L.

ICSU.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while VUAG.L is S&P 500. ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while VUAG.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ICSU.L and 0.07% for VUAG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICSU.L and VUAG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer