ICSU.L vs. PQVG.L
ICSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and PQVG.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICSU.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while PQVG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICSU.L returned 7.91%/yr vs 16.68%/yr for PQVG.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICSU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVG.L.
Performance
ICSU.L vs. PQVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICSU.L achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than PQVG.L's 16.79% return.
ICSU.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- —
PQVG.L
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 24.59%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- 16.68%
- 10Y*
- —
ICSU.L vs. PQVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.60% | -3.20% | 16.26% | -5.83% | 11.78% | 19.63% | 5.64% | 22.78% | -3.96% | 0.50% |
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 16.79% | 5.84% | 32.29% | 0.98% | 12.54% | 27.78% | 4.44% | 21.16% | -1.98% | 14.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICSU.L and PQVG.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | 0.56 |
The correlation between ICSU.L and PQVG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ICSU.L vs. PQVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICSU.L
PQVG.L
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
ICSU.L
PQVG.L
Consumer Cyclical
ICSU.L
PQVG.L
Basic Materials
ICSU.L
-
PQVG.L
Communication Services
ICSU.L
-
PQVG.L
Energy
ICSU.L
-
PQVG.L
Financial Services
ICSU.L
-
PQVG.L
Healthcare
ICSU.L
-
PQVG.L
Industrials
ICSU.L
-
PQVG.L
Real Estate
ICSU.L
-
PQVG.L
-
Technology
ICSU.L
-
PQVG.L
Utilities
ICSU.L
-
PQVG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICSU.L vs. PQVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ICSU.L
PQVG.L
ICSU.L vs. PQVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICSU.L | PQVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.41 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 5.82 | -5.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.82 | 17.49 | -16.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICSU.L | PQVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 2.31 | -2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 1.12 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.89 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
ICSU.L vs. PQVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICSU.L drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, smaller than the maximum PQVG.L drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSU.L and PQVG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICSU.L | PQVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -25.88% | +7.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -4.11% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.59% | -17.44% | +5.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.70% | -17.44% | +3.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.40% | 0.00% | -7.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -4.17% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 1.37% | +2.50% |
Volatility
ICSU.L vs. PQVG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) at 2.79%. This indicates that ICSU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICSU.L | PQVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 2.79% | +3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.97% | 7.88% | +4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.37% | 10.37% | +4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.45% | 14.89% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 16.24% | -1.93% |
ICSU.L vs. PQVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICSU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICSU.L vs. PQVG.L - Dividend Comparison
ICSU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 0.77% | 0.82% | 0.82% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 0.87% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.30% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICSU.L and PQVG.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICSU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICSU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVG.L.
ICSU.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while PQVG.L is S&P 500. ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ICSU.L and 0.35% for PQVG.L.
Find the right allocation for ICSU.L and PQVG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer