ICSU.L vs. CSPX.L
ICSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ICSU.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while CSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICSU.L returned 7.91%/yr vs 14.94%/yr for CSPX.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICSU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSPX.L.
Performance
ICSU.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ICSU.L is traded in GBp, while CSPX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSPX.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICSU.L achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than CSPX.L's 10.73% return.
ICSU.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- —
CSPX.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- YTD
- 10.73%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 28.97%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.08%
ICSU.L vs. CSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.60% | -3.20% | 16.26% | -5.83% | 11.78% | 19.63% | 5.64% | 22.78% | -3.96% | -2.26% |
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.73% | 9.09% | 27.44% | 20.40% | -9.06% | 30.58% | 14.17% | 25.59% | 0.15% | 7.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICSU.L and CSPX.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.46 |
The correlation between ICSU.L and CSPX.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ICSU.L vs. CSPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICSU.L
CSPX.L
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
ICSU.L
CSPX.L
Consumer Cyclical
ICSU.L
CSPX.L
Basic Materials
ICSU.L
-
CSPX.L
Communication Services
ICSU.L
-
CSPX.L
Energy
ICSU.L
-
CSPX.L
Financial Services
ICSU.L
-
CSPX.L
Healthcare
ICSU.L
-
CSPX.L
Industrials
ICSU.L
-
CSPX.L
Real Estate
ICSU.L
-
CSPX.L
Technology
ICSU.L
-
CSPX.L
Utilities
ICSU.L
-
CSPX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICSU.L vs. CSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
ICSU.L
CSPX.L
ICSU.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICSU.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.44 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 3.95 | -3.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.82 | 13.50 | -12.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICSU.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 2.38 | -2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.97 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.98 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
ICSU.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICSU.L drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, smaller than the maximum CSPX.L drawdown of -25.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSU.L and CSPX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICSU.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -25.99% | +7.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -7.22% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.59% | -21.16% | +9.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.70% | -21.16% | +7.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.40% | -0.21% | -7.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -3.29% | -1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 2.13% | +1.74% |
Volatility
ICSU.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 3.42%. This indicates that ICSU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICSU.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 3.42% | +3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.97% | 8.64% | +3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.37% | 11.96% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.45% | 15.39% | -1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 16.37% | -2.06% |
ICSU.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICSU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ICSU.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ICSU.L nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ICSU.L and CSPX.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSPX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ICSU.L.
ICSU.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while CSPX.L is S&P 500. ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while CSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ICSU.L and 0.07% for CSPX.L.
Find the right allocation for ICSU.L and CSPX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer