ICSU.L vs. CSP1.L
ICSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICSU.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICSU.L returned 7.91%/yr vs 14.94%/yr for CSP1.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICSU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.
Performance
ICSU.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICSU.L achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's 10.55% return.
ICSU.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- —
CSP1.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 9.89%
- 1Y
- 28.98%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.07%
ICSU.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.60% | -3.20% | 16.26% | -5.83% | 11.78% | 19.63% | 5.64% | 22.78% | -3.96% | -2.26% |
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 31.07% | 13.65% | 26.42% | 0.01% | 7.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICSU.L and CSP1.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.51 |
The correlation between ICSU.L and CSP1.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ICSU.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICSU.L
CSP1.L
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
ICSU.L
CSP1.L
Consumer Cyclical
ICSU.L
CSP1.L
Basic Materials
ICSU.L
-
CSP1.L
Communication Services
ICSU.L
-
CSP1.L
Energy
ICSU.L
-
CSP1.L
Financial Services
ICSU.L
-
CSP1.L
Healthcare
ICSU.L
-
CSP1.L
Industrials
ICSU.L
-
CSP1.L
Real Estate
ICSU.L
-
CSP1.L
Technology
ICSU.L
-
CSP1.L
Utilities
ICSU.L
-
CSP1.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICSU.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank
ICSU.L
CSP1.L
ICSU.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICSU.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.51 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 4.07 | -3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.82 | 14.99 | -14.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICSU.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 2.73 | -2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 1.04 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.09 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
ICSU.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICSU.L drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, smaller than the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSU.L and CSP1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICSU.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -25.48% | +6.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -7.12% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.59% | -20.77% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.70% | -20.77% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.40% | -0.24% | -7.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -3.32% | -1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 1.94% | +1.93% |
Volatility
ICSU.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that ICSU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICSU.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 2.62% | +3.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.97% | 7.16% | +4.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.37% | 10.62% | +3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.45% | 14.31% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 15.57% | -1.26% |
ICSU.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICSU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ICSU.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ICSU.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ICSU.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ICSU.L.
ICSU.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ICSU.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.
Find the right allocation for ICSU.L and CSP1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer