ICSU.L vs. 5ESG.L
ICSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and 5ESG.L (UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - ICSU.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while 5ESG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICSU.L returned 9.04%/yr vs 12.61%/yr for 5ESG.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICSU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for 5ESG.L.
Performance
ICSU.L vs. 5ESG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICSU.L achieves a 11.90% return, which is significantly higher than 5ESG.L's 8.11% return.
ICSU.L
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 11.90%
- 6M
- 13.00%
- 1Y
- 13.13%
- 3Y*
- 7.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- —
5ESG.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 8.11%
- 6M
- 8.13%
- 1Y
- 25.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- —
ICSU.L vs. 5ESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.90% | -3.20% | 16.26% | -5.83% | 11.78% | 19.63% | 5.64% | 15.09% |
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist | 8.11% | 18.26% | 23.62% | 26.17% | -20.24% | 31.59% | 15.01% | 16.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICSU.L and 5ESG.L is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.21 |
The correlation between ICSU.L and 5ESG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ICSU.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICSU.L
5ESG.L
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
ICSU.L
5ESG.L
Consumer Cyclical
ICSU.L
5ESG.L
Basic Materials
ICSU.L
-
5ESG.L
Communication Services
ICSU.L
-
5ESG.L
Energy
ICSU.L
-
5ESG.L
Financial Services
ICSU.L
-
5ESG.L
Healthcare
ICSU.L
-
5ESG.L
Industrials
ICSU.L
-
5ESG.L
Real Estate
ICSU.L
-
5ESG.L
Technology
ICSU.L
-
5ESG.L
Utilities
ICSU.L
-
5ESG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICSU.L vs. 5ESG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ICSU.L
5ESG.L
ICSU.L vs. 5ESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICSU.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.39 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 2.79 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.28 | 12.01 | -8.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICSU.L vs. 5ESG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICSU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum 5ESG.L drawdown of -36.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSU.L and 5ESG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICSU.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.13% | -36.07% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -9.01% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.55% | -19.53% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.55% | -25.41% | +4.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -1.87% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.32% | -5.38% | -4.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 2.10% | +1.89% |
Volatility
ICSU.L vs. 5ESG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) at 4.14%. This indicates that ICSU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 5ESG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICSU.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 4.14% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.19% | 9.25% | +2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.75% | 11.89% | +2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.21% | 16.24% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 18.04% | +0.59% |
ICSU.L vs. 5ESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICSU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 5ESG.L's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ICSU.L vs. 5ESG.L - Dividend Comparison
ICSU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 5ESG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist | 0.63% | 0.87% | 0.47% | 1.07% | 1.32% | 0.89% | 0.62% |
ICSU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICSU.L and 5ESG.L have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICSU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICSU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for 5ESG.L.
ICSU.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while 5ESG.L is S&P 500. ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ICSU.L and 0.17% for 5ESG.L.
Find the right allocation for ICSU.L and 5ESG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer