ICSFX vs. SWLVX
ICSFX (Invesco Comstock Fund Class R6) and SWLVX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ICSFX returned 12.10%/yr vs 10.43%/yr for SWLVX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ICSFX charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWLVX.
Performance
ICSFX vs. SWLVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICSFX achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly lower than SWLVX's 14.27% return.
ICSFX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 9.30%
- 6M
- 10.86%
- 1Y
- 24.04%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 18.75%
SWLVX
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- 14.27%
- 6M
- 14.87%
- 1Y
- 28.30%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- —
ICSFX vs. SWLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSFX Invesco Comstock Fund Class R6 | 9.30% | 17.60% | 15.45% | 12.81% | 1.10% | 33.86% | -0.38% | 105.40% | -12.00% | 0.68% |
SWLVX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund | 14.27% | 15.87% | 14.36% | 11.45% | -7.61% | 25.15% | 2.64% | 26.49% | -8.39% | 0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICSFX and SWLVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017 | 0.94 |
The correlation between ICSFX and SWLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICSFX vs. SWLVX — Risk / Return Rank
ICSFX
SWLVX
ICSFX vs. SWLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Comstock Fund Class R6 (ICSFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund (SWLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICSFX | SWLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.49 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 4.28 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.94 | 17.99 | -6.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICSFX | SWLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.70 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.71 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.57 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
ICSFX vs. SWLVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICSFX drawdown since its inception was -44.77%, which is greater than SWLVX's maximum drawdown of -38.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSFX and SWLVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICSFX | SWLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.77% | -38.34% | -6.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.98% | -6.82% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.59% | -15.61% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.12% | -19.05% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | 0.00% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -4.84% | -0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 1.62% | +0.47% |
Volatility
ICSFX vs. SWLVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Comstock Fund Class R6 (ICSFX) is 2.46%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund (SWLVX) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that ICSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICSFX | SWLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.46% | 3.09% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | 8.19% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.85% | 10.79% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.41% | 14.86% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 18.56% | +2.98% |
ICSFX vs. SWLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICSFX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLVX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICSFX vs. SWLVX - Dividend Comparison
ICSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, more than SWLVX's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSFX Invesco Comstock Fund Class R6 | 8.45% | 9.17% | 10.57% | 8.82% | 13.45% | 9.06% | 2.42% | 51.25% | 10.53% | 4.00% | 7.30% | 1.48% |
SWLVX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund | 1.77% | 2.02% | 2.75% | 2.56% | 2.29% | 4.86% | 2.00% | 4.35% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ICSFX and SWLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SWLVX has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to ICSFX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICSFX dropped -44.77% vs SWLVX's -38.34%.
SWLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICSFX and SWLVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer