ICSFX vs. FALGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ICSFX (Invesco Comstock Fund Class R6) and FALGX (Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ICSFX returned 18.93%/yr vs 12.63%/yr for FALGX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ICSFX charges 0.44%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for FALGX.

Performance

ICSFX vs. FALGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Comstock Fund Class R6 (ICSFX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, ICSFX has outperformed FALGX with an annualized return of 18.93%, while FALGX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.63% annualized return.

ICSFX

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.85%
• 6M: 9.78%
• YTD: 13.04%
• 1Y: 24.59%
• 3Y*: 16.50%
• 5Y*: 13.69%
• 10Y*: 18.93%
• ALL TIME*: 15.79%

FALGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 4.78%
• 3Y*: 13.76%
• 5Y*: 10.77%
• 10Y*: 12.63%
• ALL TIME*: 8.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FALGX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
ICSFX Invesco Comstock Fund Class R6	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ICSFX vs. FALGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ICSFX Invesco Comstock Fund Class R6	13.04%	17.60%	15.45%	12.81%	1.10%	33.86%	-0.38%	105.40%	-12.00%	18.31%
FALGX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M	0.00%	19.09%	18.68%	22.88%	-8.40%	25.20%	8.27%	31.01%	-8.88%	16.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ICSFX and FALGX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between ICSFX and FALGX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ICSFX vs. FALGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ICSFX

ICSFX Risk / Return Rank: 82
ICSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ICSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ICSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ICSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ICSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

FALGX

FALGX Risk / Return Rank: 10
FALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ICSFX vs. FALGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Comstock Fund Class R6 (ICSFX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ICSFX	FALGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	0.37	+1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	0.54	+2.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.11	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	0.52	+2.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.97	0.78	+10.19

ICSFX vs. FALGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICSFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the FALGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICSFX and FALGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ICSFX vs. FALGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICSFX drawdown since its inception was -44.77%, smaller than the maximum FALGX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSFX and FALGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICSFX	FALGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.77%	-64.07%	+19.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.98%	-5.06%	-2.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.59%	-21.78%	+6.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.12%	-21.78%	+4.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.77%	-37.58%	-7.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-4.20%	+3.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.13%	-14.39%	+9.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	3.14%	-1.10%

Volatility

ICSFX vs. FALGX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Comstock Fund Class R6 (ICSFX) has a higher volatility of 2.32% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX) at 0.00%. This indicates that ICSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICSFX	FALGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.32%	0.00%	+2.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.00%	0.00%	+8.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.90%	7.26%	+3.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.19%	16.49%	-1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.41%	18.53%	+2.88%

ICSFX vs. FALGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICSFX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than FALGX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICSFX vs. FALGX - Dividend Comparison

ICSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.23%, more than FALGX's 5.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FALGX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M	5.76%	5.76%	0.00%	3.20%	1.91%	6.44%	5.25%	8.39%	16.99%	6.42%	1.85%	2.74%
ICSFX Invesco Comstock Fund Class R6	8.23%	9.17%	10.57%	8.82%	13.45%	9.06%	2.42%	51.25%	10.53%	4.00%	7.30%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICSFX and FALGX in my portfolio?

ICSFX and FALGX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICSFX or FALGX?

ICSFX has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to FALGX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICSFX dropped -44.77% vs FALGX's -64.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.