PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICPI vs. LTPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICPI vs. LTPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF (ICPI) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICPI achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than LTPZ's 0.41% return.


ICPI

1D
0.05%
1M
0.44%
YTD
2.70%
6M
2.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LTPZ

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.02%
YTD
0.41%
6M
-1.15%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
-0.79%
5Y*
-5.24%
10Y*
0.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICPI vs. LTPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ICPI
iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF
2.70%0.32%
LTPZ
PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF
0.41%-1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ICPI and LTPZ is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

-0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICPI vs. LTPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICPI

LTPZ
LTPZ Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LTPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LTPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICPI vs. LTPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF (ICPI) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ICPI vs. LTPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICPILTPZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.20

0.21

+5.99

Drawdowns

ICPI vs. LTPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICPI drawdown since its inception was -0.22%, smaller than the maximum LTPZ drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICPI and LTPZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICPILTPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-40.99%

+40.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-32.74%

+32.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-12.41%

+12.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

Volatility

ICPI vs. LTPZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICPILTPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95%

9.26%

-8.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.95%

15.89%

-14.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.95%

15.07%

-14.12%

ICPI vs. LTPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICPI has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than LTPZ's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ICPI vs. LTPZ - Dividend Comparison

ICPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than LTPZ's 5.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICPI
iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF
1.80%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LTPZ
PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF
5.23%4.64%3.71%3.71%8.38%3.56%1.42%1.74%3.05%2.25%2.32%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICPI and LTPZ have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ICPI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICPI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LTPZ.

LTPZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.23%, compared with 1.80% for ICPI.

ICPI tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Inflation Linked Bond Index, while LTPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ICPI and 0.20% for LTPZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICPI and LTPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer