ICPI vs. LTPZ
ICPI (iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF) and LTPZ (PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - ICPI tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Inflation Linked Bond Index while LTPZ tracks the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. ICPI charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for LTPZ.
Performance
ICPI vs. LTPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICPI achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than LTPZ's 0.41% return.
ICPI
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LTPZ
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- -1.15%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- -0.79%
- 5Y*
- -5.24%
- 10Y*
- 0.75%
ICPI vs. LTPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ICPI iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 2.70% | 0.32% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 0.41% | -1.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICPI and LTPZ is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | -0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICPI vs. LTPZ — Risk / Return Rank
ICPI
LTPZ
ICPI vs. LTPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF (ICPI) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICPI | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.20 | 0.21 | +5.99 |
Drawdowns
ICPI vs. LTPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICPI drawdown since its inception was -0.22%, smaller than the maximum LTPZ drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICPI and LTPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICPI | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -40.99% | +40.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -32.74% | +32.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -12.41% | +12.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.20% | — |
Volatility
ICPI vs. LTPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICPI | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95% | 9.26% | -8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.95% | 15.89% | -14.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.95% | 15.07% | -14.12% |
ICPI vs. LTPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICPI has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than LTPZ's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ICPI vs. LTPZ - Dividend Comparison
ICPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than LTPZ's 5.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICPI iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 1.80% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 5.23% | 4.64% | 3.71% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.05% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICPI and LTPZ have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICPI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICPI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LTPZ.
LTPZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.23%, compared with 1.80% for ICPI.
ICPI tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Inflation Linked Bond Index, while LTPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ICPI and 0.20% for LTPZ.
Find the right allocation for ICPI and LTPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer