ICPI vs. LQDI
ICPI (iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF) and LQDI (iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds from iShares. ICPI is passively managed, while LQDI is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. ICPI charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for LQDI.
Performance
ICPI vs. LQDI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICPI achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly higher than LQDI's 1.45% return.
ICPI
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 2.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQDI
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- —
ICPI vs. LQDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ICPI iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 2.42% | 0.32% |
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 1.45% | 0.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICPI and LQDI is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICPI vs. LQDI — Risk / Return Rank
ICPI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQDI
ICPI vs. LQDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF (ICPI) and iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICPI | LQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.54 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICPI vs. LQDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICPI drawdown since its inception was -0.34%, smaller than the maximum LQDI drawdown of -28.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICPI and LQDI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICPI | LQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.34% | -28.99% | +28.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.66% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -5.22% | +5.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.96% | — |
Volatility
ICPI vs. LQDI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICPI | LQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96% | 4.96% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.96% | 8.14% | -7.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.96% | 10.81% | -9.85% |
ICPI vs. LQDI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICPI has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDI's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ICPI vs. LQDI - Dividend Comparison
ICPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than LQDI's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICPI iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 1.80% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 4.59% | 4.46% | 4.65% | 3.98% | 3.27% | 2.42% | 2.34% | 3.26% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICPI and LQDI have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICPI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICPI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for LQDI.
LQDI has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 1.80% for ICPI.
Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ICPI and 0.18% for LQDI.
Find the right allocation for ICPI and LQDI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer