ICOM.L vs. UC15.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L).
ICOM.L and UC15.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICOM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity (Total Return Index). It was launched on Jul 18, 2017. UC15.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the UBS CMCI. It was launched on Dec 20, 2010. Both ICOM.L and UC15.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ICOM.L vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICOM.L vs. UC15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOM.L iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.93% | 16.45% | 5.07% | -8.06% | 14.83% | 27.05% | -3.74% | 6.75% | -10.19% | 5.58% |
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 15.01% | 10.31% | 4.66% | -1.58% | 16.07% | 34.87% | 0.50% | 9.54% | -10.61% | 8.61% |
Different Trading Currencies
ICOM.L is traded in USD, while UC15.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC15.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICOM.L achieves a 22.93% return, which is significantly higher than UC15.L's 15.01% return.
ICOM.L
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 8.93%
- YTD
- 22.93%
- 6M
- 30.67%
- 1Y
- 30.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- —
UC15.L
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 6.07%
- YTD
- 15.01%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 19.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.05%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICOM.L vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICOM.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than UC15.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICOM.L vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank
ICOM.L
UC15.L
ICOM.L vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICOM.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 1.40 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | 1.87 | +0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.26 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.30 | 3.03 | +1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.16 | 8.40 | +1.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICOM.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.40 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.88 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.23 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICOM.L and UC15.L is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ICOM.L vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ICOM.L nor UC15.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ICOM.L vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICOM.L drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum UC15.L drawdown of -51.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOM.L and UC15.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICOM.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.13% | -42.93% | +9.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | -8.81% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.74% | -17.43% | -9.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -2.90% | +1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.08% | -15.34% | +2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.64% | +0.40% |
Volatility
ICOM.L vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) at 5.75%. This indicates that ICOM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICOM.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.29% | 5.75% | +1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.15% | 9.94% | +3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.24% | 14.13% | +2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 14.84% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 14.56% | +0.51% |