ICMUX vs. IOBZX
ICMUX (Intrepid Income Fund) and IOBZX (ICON FlexibleBondFund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, ICMUX returned 5.89%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for IOBZX. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICMUX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for IOBZX.
Performance
ICMUX vs. IOBZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICMUX achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly higher than IOBZX's 1.24% return. Over the past 10 years, ICMUX has outperformed IOBZX with an annualized return of 5.89%, while IOBZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.12% annualized return.
ICMUX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 8.40%
- 3Y*
- 9.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 5.89%
IOBZX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 5.37%
- 3Y*
- 6.50%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.12%
ICMUX vs. IOBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICMUX Intrepid Income Fund | 2.43% | 8.16% | 10.43% | 10.90% | -3.17% | 10.02% | 8.77% | 4.65% | 0.53% | 3.79% |
IOBZX ICON FlexibleBondFund | 1.24% | 5.67% | 8.33% | 8.28% | -5.63% | 4.17% | 4.61% | 8.16% | 0.87% | 4.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICMUX and IOBZX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2010 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, ICMUX and IOBZX have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICMUX vs. IOBZX — Risk / Return Rank
ICMUX
IOBZX
ICMUX vs. IOBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX) and ICON FlexibleBondFund (IOBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICMUX | IOBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.16 | 1.69 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.37 | 2.67 | +3.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.42 | 12.08 | +10.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICMUX | IOBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.44 | 2.77 | +1.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.37 | 1.33 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.29 | 1.12 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.10 | 1.12 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
ICMUX vs. IOBZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICMUX drawdown since its inception was -8.77%, smaller than the maximum IOBZX drawdown of -15.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICMUX and IOBZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICMUX | IOBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -15.53% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.34% | -2.08% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.11% | -2.97% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.64% | -8.48% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.77% | -15.53% | +6.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.74% | -1.28% | +0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | 0.46% | -0.08% |
Volatility
ICMUX vs. IOBZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX) is 0.58%, while ICON FlexibleBondFund (IOBZX) has a volatility of 0.64%. This indicates that ICMUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICMUX | IOBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.58% | 0.64% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.43% | 1.61% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93% | 2.00% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.66% | 2.82% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.58% | 3.70% | -1.12% |
ICMUX vs. IOBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICMUX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than IOBZX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICMUX vs. IOBZX - Dividend Comparison
ICMUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than IOBZX's 6.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICMUX Intrepid Income Fund | 7.55% | 7.96% | 7.85% | 9.10% | 8.17% | 5.99% | 5.56% | 3.35% | 3.07% | 2.86% | 3.01% | 3.53% |
IOBZX ICON FlexibleBondFund | 6.12% | 6.74% | 6.71% | 5.65% | 5.22% | 4.90% | 4.03% | 4.67% | 4.18% | 4.07% | 3.58% | 4.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICMUX and IOBZX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IOBZX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to ICMUX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICMUX dropped -8.77% vs IOBZX's -15.53%.
ICMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.44 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICMUX and IOBZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer