ICMPX vs. LZEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX).
ICMPX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Dec 30, 2018. LZEMX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Jul 14, 1994.
Performance
ICMPX vs. LZEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICMPX vs. LZEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICMPX Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio | -11.59% | 11.70% | 5.62% | 17.84% | -20.11% | 10.02% | 23.95% | 32.86% |
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio | 5.00% | 41.35% | 7.60% | 22.44% | -14.86% | 5.37% | -0.07% | 18.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICMPX achieves a -11.59% return, which is significantly lower than LZEMX's 5.00% return.
ICMPX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -10.49%
- YTD
- -11.59%
- 6M
- -13.07%
- 1Y
- -3.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- —
LZEMX
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -9.45%
- YTD
- 5.00%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 39.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICMPX vs. LZEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICMPX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than LZEMX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICMPX vs. LZEMX — Risk / Return Rank
ICMPX
LZEMX
ICMPX vs. LZEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICMPX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | 2.74 | -3.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | 3.49 | -3.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.53 | -0.56 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 3.47 | -3.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 13.04 | -14.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICMPX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | 2.74 | -3.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.77 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.38 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICMPX and LZEMX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ICMPX vs. LZEMX - Dividend Comparison
ICMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than LZEMX's 1.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICMPX Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio | 4.92% | 4.35% | 2.92% | 0.62% | 1.07% | 2.04% | 0.87% | 2.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio | 1.95% | 2.05% | 3.11% | 3.76% | 5.92% | 4.89% | 2.11% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
ICMPX vs. LZEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICMPX drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum LZEMX drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICMPX and LZEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICMPX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -60.08% | +25.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.45% | -10.61% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.70% | -30.55% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.17% | -10.42% | -4.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -16.71% | +7.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 2.83% | +1.52% |
Volatility
ICMPX vs. LZEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX) is 4.86%, while Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that ICMPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LZEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICMPX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 5.92% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.84% | 9.63% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.89% | 14.26% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 14.09% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 16.33% | +1.32% |