ICLU.L vs. JPHY
ICLU.L (Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc) and JPHY (JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICLU.L is a CLO fund actively managed by Invesco, while JPHY is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICLU.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for JPHY.
Performance
ICLU.L vs. JPHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ICLU.L having a 2.17% return and JPHY slightly lower at 2.07%.
ICLU.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 2.17%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPHY
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICLU.L vs. JPHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ICLU.L Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc | 2.17% | 2.65% |
JPHY JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF | 2.07% | 4.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICLU.L and JPHY is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICLU.L vs. JPHY — Risk / Return Rank
ICLU.L
JPHY
ICLU.L vs. JPHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc (ICLU.L) and JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICLU.L | JPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICLU.L | JPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.37 | 2.17 | +1.20 |
Drawdowns
ICLU.L vs. JPHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLU.L drawdown since its inception was -0.91%, smaller than the maximum JPHY drawdown of -1.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLU.L and JPHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICLU.L | JPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.91% | -1.65% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.09% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -0.21% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.13% | — | — |
Volatility
ICLU.L vs. JPHY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICLU.L | JPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26% | 3.04% | -1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.46% | 3.04% | -1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.46% | 3.04% | -1.58% |
ICLU.L vs. JPHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than JPHY's 0.24% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ICLU.L vs. JPHY - Dividend Comparison
ICLU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JPHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ICLU.L Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPHY JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF | 5.92% | 3.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICLU.L and JPHY have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPHY is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPHY is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ICLU.L.
ICLU.L is categorized as CLO, while JPHY is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ICLU.L and 0.24% for JPHY.
Find the right allocation for ICLU.L and JPHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer