PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICLU.L vs. ICLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICLU.L vs. ICLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc (ICLU.L) and Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ICLU.L having a 2.45% return and ICLO slightly lower at 2.44%.


ICLU.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.44%
YTD
2.45%
6M
2.52%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ICLO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
YTD
2.44%
6M
2.56%
1Y
5.17%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICLU.L vs. ICLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ICLU.L and ICLO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2025

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICLU.L vs. ICLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICLU.L
ICLU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ICLU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICLU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICLU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ICLU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICLU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

ICLO
ICLO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ICLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ICLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICLU.L vs. ICLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc (ICLU.L) and Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICLU.LICLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.27

1.88

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.17

14.77

-6.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.34

64.22

-25.88

ICLU.L vs. ICLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICLU.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.21, which is comparable to the ICLO Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICLU.L and ICLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICLU.L vs. ICLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICLU.L drawdown since its inception was -0.91%, smaller than the maximum ICLO drawdown of -3.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLU.L and ICLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICLU.LICLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-3.47%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.63%

-0.35%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.04%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-0.06%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.13%

0.08%

+0.05%

Volatility

ICLU.L vs. ICLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc (ICLU.L) is 0.19%, while Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO) has a volatility of 0.47%. This indicates that ICLU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICLU.LICLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.19%

0.47%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.83%

0.88%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22%

1.38%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.44%

2.41%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.44%

2.41%

-0.97%

ICLU.L vs. ICLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICLU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ICLO's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ICLU.L vs. ICLO - Dividend Comparison

ICLU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%.


PositionTTM202520242023
ICLO
Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF
5.02%5.49%6.51%7.01%
ICLU.L
Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICLU.L and ICLO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ICLU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICLU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for ICLO.

Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ICLU.L and 0.26% for ICLO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICLU.L and ICLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer