ICLU.L vs. EQQU.L
ICLU.L (Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc) and EQQU.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICLU.L is a CLO fund actively managed by Invesco, while EQQU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. ICLU.L is actively managed, while EQQU.L is passively managed. Over the past year, ICLU.L returned 5.17% vs 40.23% for EQQU.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICLU.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQU.L.
Performance
ICLU.L vs. EQQU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICLU.L achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly lower than EQQU.L's 19.55% return.
ICLU.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQQU.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 6M
- 19.04%
- 1Y
- 40.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.98%
- 5Y*
- 17.59%
- 10Y*
- 21.19%
ICLU.L vs. EQQU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ICLU.L Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc | 2.18% | 4.23% |
EQQU.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 19.55% | 17.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICLU.L and EQQU.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2025 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICLU.L vs. EQQU.L — Risk / Return Rank
ICLU.L
EQQU.L
ICLU.L vs. EQQU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc (ICLU.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICLU.L | EQQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.23 | 1.43 | +0.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.20 | 3.64 | +4.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.46 | 13.04 | +25.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICLU.L | EQQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.12 | 2.52 | +1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.37 | 0.95 | +2.42 |
Drawdowns
ICLU.L vs. EQQU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLU.L drawdown since its inception was -0.91%, smaller than the maximum EQQU.L drawdown of -35.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLU.L and EQQU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICLU.L | EQQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.91% | -35.17% | +34.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.63% | -11.00% | +10.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.77% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -6.10% | +6.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.13% | 3.08% | -2.95% |
Volatility
ICLU.L vs. EQQU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc (ICLU.L) is 0.19%, while Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that ICLU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICLU.L | EQQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.19% | 4.93% | -4.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.82% | 11.88% | -11.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26% | 15.88% | -14.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.46% | 20.76% | -19.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.46% | 19.97% | -18.51% |
ICLU.L vs. EQQU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICLU.L vs. EQQU.L - Dividend Comparison
ICLU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQU.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.26% | 0.11% |
ICLU.L Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICLU.L and EQQU.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICLU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICLU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQU.L.
ICLU.L is categorized as CLO, while EQQU.L is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ICLU.L and 0.30% for EQQU.L.
Find the right allocation for ICLU.L and EQQU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer