ICLR vs. VRT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT).

Performance

ICLR vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ICLR vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ICLR ICON Public Limited Company	-39.27%	-13.11%	-25.92%	45.72%	-37.28%	58.84%	13.21%	33.29%	-6.16%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	54.71%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-45.25%	33.80%	69.36%	12.55%	-0.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ICLR : $8.64B VRT : $98.15B
EPS ICLR : $7.61 VRT : $3.41
PE Ratio ICLR : 14.55 VRT : 73.44
PEG Ratio ICLR : 0.37 VRT : 0.32
PS Ratio ICLR : 1.08 VRT : 13.32
PB Ratio ICLR : 0.93 VRT : 24.90
Total Revenue (TTM) ICLR : $8.10B VRT : $7.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) ICLR : $2.18B VRT : $736.40M
EBITDA (TTM) ICLR : $1.18B VRT : $2.05B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICLR achieves a -39.27% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 54.71% return.

ICLR

• 1D: 5.29%
• 1M: 2.33%
• YTD: -39.27%
• 6M: -36.77%
• 1Y: -36.76%
• 3Y*: -19.68%
• 5Y*: -11.37%
• 10Y*: 3.91%

VRT

• 1D: 6.98%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 54.71%
• 6M: 66.20%
• 1Y: 247.49%
• 3Y*: 159.97%
• 5Y*: 64.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ICLR vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICLR

ICLR Risk / Return Rank: 17
ICLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
ICLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
ICLR Omega Ratio Rank: 20
ICLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
ICLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 98
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICLR vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ICLR	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.55	3.97	-4.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.38	3.91	-4.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.52	-0.58
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.63	9.60	-10.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.68	27.88	-29.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICLR vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICLR Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICLR and VRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICLR	VRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.55	3.97	-4.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.26	1.06	-1.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.97	-0.72

Correlation

The correlation between ICLR and VRT is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ICLR vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

ICLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ICLR ICON Public Limited Company	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.08%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Drawdowns

ICLR vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICLR drawdown since its inception was -76.87%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLR and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICLR	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.87%	-71.24%	-5.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.54%	-24.78%	-35.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.87%	-71.24%	-5.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.04%	-9.26%	-58.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.24%	-16.47%	-6.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.68%	8.53%	+14.15%

Volatility

ICLR vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) is 13.13%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 20.14%. This indicates that ICLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICLR	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.13%	20.14%	-7.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.11%	45.36%	+18.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.65%	62.91%	+4.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.48%	61.08%	-17.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.98%	54.59%	-17.61%

Financials