PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICLR vs. VRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ICLR vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICLR achieves a -7.96% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 96.90% return.


ICLR

1D
-0.62%
1M
14.74%
6M
-7.53%
YTD
-7.96%
1Y
11.43%
3Y*
-11.18%
5Y*
-4.44%
10Y*
8.67%

VRT

1D
-1.56%
1M
5.30%
6M
95.01%
YTD
96.90%
1Y
158.89%
3Y*
132.96%
5Y*
63.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICLR vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ICLR
ICON Public Limited Company
-7.96%-13.11%-25.92%45.72%-37.28%58.84%13.21%33.29%-8.36%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
96.90%42.80%136.82%251.81%-45.25%33.80%69.36%12.55%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ICLR and VRT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018

0.28

The correlation between ICLR and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ICLR:

$12.84B

VRT:

$122.48B

EPS

ICLR:

$5.87

VRT:

$3.98

PE Ratio

ICLR:

28.55

VRT:

80.07

PEG Ratio

ICLR:

0.75

VRT:

0.35

PS Ratio

ICLR:

0.79

VRT:

11.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

ICLR:

$8.25B

VRT:

$10.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ICLR:

$2.18B

VRT:

$3.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

ICLR:

$823.57M

VRT:

$2.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICLR vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICLR
ICLR Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ICLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICLR Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ICLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICLR Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICLR vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICLRVRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.39

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

6.54

-6.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.37

16.18

-15.81

ICLR vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICLR and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICLR vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICLR drawdown since its inception was -76.87%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLR and VRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICLRVRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.87%

-71.24%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.54%

-25.32%

-35.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.87%

-61.28%

-15.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.87%

-71.24%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.55%

-15.23%

-36.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.61%

-16.22%

-7.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.87%

10.21%

+17.66%

Volatility

ICLR vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) is 15.27%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 24.73%. This indicates that ICLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICLRVRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.27%

24.73%

-9.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.72%

48.62%

+19.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.02%

61.75%

+9.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.43%

62.71%

-17.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.06%

54.98%

-16.92%

Dividends

ICLR vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

ICLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ICLR
ICON Public Limited Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.07%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%

Financials

ICLR vs. VRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ICON Public Limited Company and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.19B
2.65B
(ICLR) Total Revenue
(VRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ICLR vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ICON Public Limited Company and Vertiv Holdings Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
27.4%
37.7%
Portfolio components
ICLR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ICON Public Limited Company reported a gross profit of 599.39M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

ICLR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ICON Public Limited Company reported an operating income of 324.79M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

ICLR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ICON Public Limited Company reported a net income of -110.14M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of -5.0%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ICLR and VRT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRT has higher volatility (24.73%) compared to ICLR (15.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICLR dropped -76.87% vs VRT's -71.24%.

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICLR and VRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer