ICLO vs. RAAA

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ICLO (Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF) and RAAA (Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ICLO returned 5.36% vs 5.43% for RAAA. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ICLO charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RAAA.

Performance

ICLO vs. RAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO) and Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICLO achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than RAAA's 3.12% return.

ICLO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 2.43%
• YTD: 2.89%
• 1Y: 5.36%
• 3Y*: 6.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.71%

RAAA

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: 2.41%
• YTD: 3.12%
• 1Y: 5.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ICLO Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF	$3.82M	$3.03M	$3.02M
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF	$56.96K	$102.98K	$100.22K

ICLO vs. RAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ICLO Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF	2.89%	2.55%
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF	3.12%	2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ICLO and RAAA is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

ICLO vs. RAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ICLO

ICLO Risk / Return Rank: 98
ICLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ICLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ICLO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ICLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ICLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

RAAA

RAAA Risk / Return Rank: 98
RAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
RAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ICLO vs. RAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO) and Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ICLO	RAAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.29	4.11	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.58	5.94	+1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.07	2.14	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	17.20	7.70	+9.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	73.40	43.03	+30.36

ICLO vs. RAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICLO Sharpe Ratio is 4.29, which is comparable to the RAAA Sharpe Ratio of 4.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICLO and RAAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ICLO vs. RAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICLO drawdown since its inception was -3.47%, which is greater than RAAA's maximum drawdown of -0.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLO and RAAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICLO	RAAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.47%	-0.71%	-2.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.31%	-0.71%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.06%	-0.05%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.07%	0.13%	-0.06%

Volatility

ICLO vs. RAAA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO) has a higher volatility of 0.20% compared to Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA) at 0.14%. This indicates that ICLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICLO	RAAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.20%	0.14%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.81%	0.95%	-0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26%	1.33%	-0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.38%	1.29%	+1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.38%	1.29%	+1.09%

ICLO vs. RAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICLO has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RAAA's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICLO vs. RAAA - Dividend Comparison

ICLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, less than RAAA's 5.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ICLO Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF	4.96%	5.49%	6.51%	7.01%
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF	5.38%	2.70%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICLO and RAAA in my portfolio?

ICLO and RAAA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICLO or RAAA?

ICLO has higher volatility (0.20%) compared to RAAA (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICLO dropped -3.47% vs RAAA's -0.71%.

Which ETF is better, ICLO or RAAA?

On 1-year performance, RAAA leads with 5.43% vs 5.36% for ICLO. On fees, ICLO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ICLO or RAAA?

Over the 1-year period, RAAA has performed better with a 5.43% return vs 5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICLO or RAAA?

ICLO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RAAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICLO or RAAA?

RAAA has the higher dividend yield at 5.38%, compared with 4.96% for ICLO.

What is the main difference between ICLO and RAAA?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Reckoner. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ICLO and 0.30% for RAAA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 4.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.