PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICLAX vs. SIFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ICLAX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Asset Allocation Conservative Portfolio (ICLAX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ICLAX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICLAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Conservative Portfolio
-1.47%12.18%7.30%10.23%-15.19%5.43%13.16%12.33%-4.36%11.12%
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
8.96%7.82%4.08%-1.74%8.48%10.83%-1.59%5.68%-3.64%-1.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICLAX achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than SIFAX's 8.96% return. Over the past 10 years, ICLAX has outperformed SIFAX with an annualized return of 5.09%, while SIFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.91% annualized return.


ICLAX

1D
1.26%
1M
-3.33%
YTD
-1.47%
6M
0.02%
1Y
8.92%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
5.09%

SIFAX

1D
-0.35%
1M
1.77%
YTD
8.96%
6M
10.57%
1Y
10.85%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
3.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ICLAX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICLAX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ICLAX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICLAX
ICLAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ICLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ICLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SIFAX
SIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICLAX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Asset Allocation Conservative Portfolio (ICLAX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICLAXSIFAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

2.03

-0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.82

2.86

-1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.40

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

3.49

-1.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.98

8.92

-1.94

ICLAX vs. SIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the SIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICLAX and SIFAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICLAXSIFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

2.03

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

1.25

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.76

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.36

+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between ICLAX and SIFAX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ICLAX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison

ICLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than SIFAX's 4.18% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICLAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Conservative Portfolio
3.20%3.27%2.80%2.50%1.79%7.84%4.16%4.06%7.97%7.69%4.61%5.90%
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
4.18%4.55%3.25%3.82%11.90%7.89%1.45%1.49%1.90%1.39%1.15%0.48%

Drawdowns

ICLAX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICLAX drawdown since its inception was -30.99%, which is greater than SIFAX's maximum drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLAX and SIFAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ICLAXSIFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.99%

-23.62%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.35%

-3.07%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.78%

-8.32%

-12.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.78%

-14.69%

-6.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.82%

-0.35%

-3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-8.65%

+4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

1.25%

+0.12%

Volatility

ICLAX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Asset Allocation Conservative Portfolio (ICLAX) has a higher volatility of 3.22% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) at 2.04%. This indicates that ICLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ICLAXSIFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

2.04%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.69%

3.93%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.32%

5.30%

+2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.31%

5.50%

+1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.17%

5.16%

+2.01%