ICHN.AS vs. CNYA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF (ICHN.AS) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA).
ICHN.AS and CNYA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICHN.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jun 20, 2019. CNYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Jun 13, 2016. Both ICHN.AS and CNYA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ICHN.AS vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICHN.AS vs. CNYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICHN.AS iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF | -6.56% | 31.69% | 18.56% | -11.72% | -22.52% | -22.05% | 29.63% | 10.95% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | -0.93% | 26.48% | 10.78% | -13.76% | -26.51% | 3.53% | 41.54% | 9.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICHN.AS achieves a -6.56% return, which is significantly lower than CNYA's -0.93% return.
ICHN.AS
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- -6.56%
- 6M
- -13.57%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.11%
- 5Y*
- -5.22%
- 10Y*
- —
CNYA
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -5.18%
- YTD
- -0.93%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 25.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.59%
- 5Y*
- -1.42%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICHN.AS vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICHN.AS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICHN.AS vs. CNYA — Risk / Return Rank
ICHN.AS
CNYA
ICHN.AS vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF (ICHN.AS) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICHN.AS | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 1.34 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.46 | 1.84 | -1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.27 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 2.15 | -1.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.50 | 9.28 | -6.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICHN.AS | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 1.34 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | -0.06 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.23 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICHN.AS and CNYA is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ICHN.AS vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison
ICHN.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICHN.AS iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 1.93% | 1.92% | 2.51% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.97% | 1.38% |
Drawdowns
ICHN.AS vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICHN.AS drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, which is greater than CNYA's maximum drawdown of -49.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICHN.AS and CNYA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICHN.AS | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.67% | -49.49% | -13.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.87% | -11.47% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.59% | -45.11% | -11.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.83% | -21.52% | -13.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -20.77% | -13.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.08% | 2.67% | +3.41% |
Volatility
ICHN.AS vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF (ICHN.AS) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) at 4.99%. This indicates that ICHN.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICHN.AS | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 4.99% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.21% | 11.62% | +2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.30% | 18.85% | +3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.91% | 23.71% | +5.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 23.60% | +5.28% |