ICGA.DE vs. XEON.DE
ICGA.DE (iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc) and XEON.DE (Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - ICGA.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China, while XEON.DE is a Bank Loan fund tracking the Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICGA.DE returned -4.32%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for XEON.DE. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. ICGA.DE charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for XEON.DE.
Performance
ICGA.DE vs. XEON.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICGA.DE achieves a -6.86% return, which is significantly lower than XEON.DE's 0.80% return.
ICGA.DE
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- -6.86%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 2.73%
- 3Y*
- 7.72%
- 5Y*
- -4.32%
- 10Y*
- —
XEON.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- 0.70%
ICGA.DE vs. XEON.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICGA.DE iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc | -6.86% | 16.64% | 27.28% | -14.71% | -15.17% | -17.27% | 15.31% | 14.05% |
XEON.DE Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.80% | 2.25% | 3.78% | 3.30% | -0.04% | -0.58% | -0.57% | -0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICGA.DE and XEON.DE is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICGA.DE vs. XEON.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ICGA.DE
XEON.DE
ICGA.DE vs. XEON.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE) and Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICGA.DE | XEON.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -20.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 4.27 | -3.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 69.36 | -69.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 316.53 | -316.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICGA.DE | XEON.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 8.94 | -8.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 7.54 | -7.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.74 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
ICGA.DE vs. XEON.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICGA.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.95%, which is greater than XEON.DE's maximum drawdown of -3.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICGA.DE and XEON.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICGA.DE | XEON.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.95% | -3.71% | -52.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.84% | -0.03% | -16.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.41% | -0.08% | -24.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.32% | -0.71% | -48.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -3.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.56% | -0.01% | -32.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.80% | -0.92% | -27.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.08% | 0.01% | +8.07% |
Volatility
ICGA.DE vs. XEON.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) at 0.04%. This indicates that ICGA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEON.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICGA.DE | XEON.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 0.04% | +7.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.31% | 0.16% | +13.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.64% | 0.22% | +18.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.66% | 0.25% | +27.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 0.39% | +26.58% |
ICGA.DE vs. XEON.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICGA.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than XEON.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICGA.DE vs. XEON.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ICGA.DE nor XEON.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ICGA.DE and XEON.DE have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEON.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEON.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for ICGA.DE.
ICGA.DE is categorized as China Equities, while XEON.DE is Bank Loan. ICGA.DE tracks MSCI China, while XEON.DE tracks Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ICGA.DE and 0.10% for XEON.DE.
Find the right allocation for ICGA.DE and XEON.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer