PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICGA.DE vs. XCS7.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICGA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ICGA.DE having a -6.86% return and XCS7.DE slightly lower at -6.89%.


ICGA.DE

1D
-0.54%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
-6.86%
6M
-8.51%
1Y
2.73%
3Y*
7.72%
5Y*
-4.32%
10Y*

XCS7.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
-6.89%
6M
-8.38%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
7.69%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICGA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ICGA.DE
iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc
-6.86%16.64%27.28%-14.71%4.03%
XCS7.DE
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D
-6.89%16.53%27.49%-14.73%4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ICGA.DE and XCS7.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022

0.99

The correlation between ICGA.DE and XCS7.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICGA.DE vs. XCS7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICGA.DE
ICGA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ICGA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICGA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICGA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ICGA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICGA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XCS7.DE
XCS7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
XCS7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICGA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICGA.DEXCS7.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.04

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

0.16

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

0.34

0.00

ICGA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICGA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is comparable to the XCS7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICGA.DE and XCS7.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICGA.DEXCS7.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

0.15

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.20

-0.15

Drawdowns

ICGA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICGA.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.95%, which is greater than XCS7.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICGA.DE and XCS7.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICGA.DEXCS7.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.95%

-36.62%

-19.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.84%

-17.01%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.41%

-24.53%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.56%

-14.97%

-17.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.80%

-15.59%

-13.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.08%

8.18%

-0.10%

Volatility

ICGA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) have volatilities of 7.19% and 7.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICGA.DEXCS7.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.19%

7.33%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.31%

13.19%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.64%

18.48%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.66%

25.65%

+2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.97%

25.65%

+1.32%

ICGA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ICGA.DE and XCS7.DE have an expense ratio of 0.28%.


Dividends

ICGA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Dividend Comparison

ICGA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XCS7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%.


PositionTTM202520242023
ICGA.DE
iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCS7.DE
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D
2.11%2.35%2.05%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, ICGA.DE and XCS7.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.28% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICGA.DE and XCS7.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.28% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI China. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICGA.DE and XCS7.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer