ICGA.DE vs. XCHA.DE
ICGA.DE (iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc) and XCHA.DE (Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both China Equities funds - ICGA.DE tracks the MSCI China while XCHA.DE tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICGA.DE returned -4.32%/yr vs 3.01%/yr for XCHA.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICGA.DE charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XCHA.DE.
Performance
ICGA.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICGA.DE achieves a -6.86% return, which is significantly lower than XCHA.DE's 12.47% return.
ICGA.DE
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- -6.86%
- 6M
- -9.46%
- 1Y
- 2.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.72%
- 5Y*
- -4.32%
- 10Y*
- —
XCHA.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 39.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.45%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
ICGA.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICGA.DE iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc | -6.86% | 16.64% | 27.28% | -14.71% | -15.17% | -17.27% | 15.31% | 14.05% |
XCHA.DE Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 12.47% | 14.69% | 24.35% | -14.26% | -19.18% | 13.33% | 31.24% | 11.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICGA.DE and XCHA.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019 | 0.73 |
The correlation between ICGA.DE and XCHA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICGA.DE vs. XCHA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ICGA.DE
XCHA.DE
ICGA.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICGA.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.41 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 2.38 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 4.62 | -4.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICGA.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 1.48 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 0.13 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.31 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
ICGA.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICGA.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.95%, which is greater than XCHA.DE's maximum drawdown of -52.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICGA.DE and XCHA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICGA.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.95% | -52.27% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.84% | -16.43% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.41% | -26.32% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.32% | -37.07% | -12.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.56% | -1.81% | -30.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.80% | -22.73% | -6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.08% | 8.48% | -0.40% |
Volatility
ICGA.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) at 5.10%. This indicates that ICGA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCHA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICGA.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 5.10% | +2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.31% | 10.37% | +2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.64% | 26.51% | -7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.66% | 23.27% | +4.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 23.20% | +3.77% |
ICGA.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICGA.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than XCHA.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICGA.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ICGA.DE nor XCHA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ICGA.DE and XCHA.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICGA.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICGA.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHA.DE.
ICGA.DE tracks MSCI China, while XCHA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ICGA.DE and 0.50% for XCHA.DE.
Find the right allocation for ICGA.DE and XCHA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer