ICGA.DE vs. XBLC.L
ICGA.DE (iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc) and XBLC.L (Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - ICGA.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China, while XBLC.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICGA.DE returned -3.91%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XBLC.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICGA.DE charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XBLC.L.
Performance
ICGA.DE vs. XBLC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICGA.DE achieves a -7.21% return, which is significantly lower than XBLC.L's 1.01% return.
ICGA.DE
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- -7.21%
- 6M
- -6.68%
- 1Y
- 3.16%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- -3.91%
- 10Y*
- —
XBLC.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 2.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.13%
- 10Y*
- —
ICGA.DE vs. XBLC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICGA.DE iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc | -7.21% | 16.59% | 27.32% | -14.87% | -15.07% | -17.34% | 15.34% | 14.19% |
XBLC.L Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 1.01% | 2.95% | 4.36% | 7.50% | -13.29% | -1.05% | 2.52% | 0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICGA.DE and XBLC.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2019 | 0.12 |
The correlation between ICGA.DE and XBLC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (5 years) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICGA.DE vs. XBLC.L — Risk / Return Rank
ICGA.DE
XBLC.L
ICGA.DE vs. XBLC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICGA.DE | XBLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.16 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 0.92 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.37 | 3.15 | -2.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICGA.DE vs. XBLC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICGA.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.91%, which is greater than XBLC.L's maximum drawdown of -17.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICGA.DE and XBLC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICGA.DE | XBLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.91% | -17.18% | -38.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.50% | -2.67% | -14.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.29% | -2.67% | -21.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.29% | -17.18% | -32.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.83% | -0.60% | -32.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.78% | -4.49% | -24.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.47% | 0.78% | +7.69% |
Volatility
ICGA.DE vs. XBLC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) at 1.08%. This indicates that ICGA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBLC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICGA.DE | XBLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 1.08% | +4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.75% | 2.66% | +11.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.96% | 3.01% | +15.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.79% | 4.39% | +23.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.05% | 4.70% | +22.35% |
ICGA.DE vs. XBLC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICGA.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than XBLC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICGA.DE vs. XBLC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ICGA.DE nor XBLC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ICGA.DE and XBLC.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBLC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBLC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for ICGA.DE.
ICGA.DE is categorized as China Equities, while XBLC.L is European Corporate Bonds. ICGA.DE tracks MSCI China, while XBLC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ICGA.DE and 0.12% for XBLC.L.
Find the right allocation for ICGA.DE and XBLC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer