ICFSX vs. FSLBX
Compare and contrast key facts about ICON Consumer Select Fund (ICFSX) and Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX).
ICFSX is managed by ICON Funds. It was launched on Jul 1, 1997. FSLBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 29, 1985.
Performance
ICFSX vs. FSLBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICFSX vs. FSLBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICFSX ICON Consumer Select Fund | -9.09% | 5.96% | 35.19% | 18.16% | -10.30% | 22.79% | -7.47% | 36.93% | -18.04% | 20.03% |
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio | -18.16% | 5.78% | 35.74% | 27.77% | -17.54% | 40.61% | 22.66% | 31.60% | -15.37% | 27.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICFSX achieves a -9.09% return, which is significantly higher than FSLBX's -18.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ICFSX has underperformed FSLBX with an annualized return of 10.05%, while FSLBX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.24% annualized return.
ICFSX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- YTD
- -9.09%
- 6M
- -7.47%
- 1Y
- 1.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
FSLBX
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- -18.16%
- 6M
- -20.14%
- 1Y
- -6.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICFSX vs. FSLBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICFSX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than FSLBX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICFSX vs. FSLBX — Risk / Return Rank
ICFSX
FSLBX
ICFSX vs. FSLBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON Consumer Select Fund (ICFSX) and Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICFSX | FSLBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.06 | -0.24 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.23 | -0.16 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.98 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | -0.35 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | -0.93 | +0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICFSX | FSLBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 | -0.24 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.42 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.56 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.44 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICFSX and FSLBX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ICFSX vs. FSLBX - Dividend Comparison
ICFSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.37%, more than FSLBX's 0.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICFSX ICON Consumer Select Fund | 12.37% | 11.25% | 34.59% | 7.32% | 17.71% | 10.98% | 0.00% | 1.94% | 0.75% | 0.21% | 0.97% | 0.59% |
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.69% | 1.22% | 2.09% | 1.39% | 3.08% | 4.25% | 8.94% | 5.46% | 1.25% | 6.37% |
Drawdowns
ICFSX vs. FSLBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICFSX drawdown since its inception was -77.40%, which is greater than FSLBX's maximum drawdown of -68.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICFSX and FSLBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICFSX | FSLBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.40% | -68.20% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.36% | -24.67% | +10.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.27% | -30.87% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.50% | -40.56% | -7.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.04% | -23.61% | +11.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.45% | -14.86% | -6.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | 9.25% | -4.95% |
Volatility
ICFSX vs. FSLBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ICON Consumer Select Fund (ICFSX) is 4.30%, while Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that ICFSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSLBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICFSX | FSLBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 6.18% | -1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.19% | 17.15% | -6.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.76% | 27.03% | -7.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 22.76% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 23.67% | +0.11% |