ICFSX vs. FIKBX
ICFSX (ICON Consumer Select Fund) and FIKBX (Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z) are both Financials Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ICFSX returned 10.14%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for FIKBX. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ICFSX charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FIKBX.
Performance
ICFSX vs. FIKBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICFSX achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly lower than FIKBX's 9.88% return.
ICFSX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 4.33%
- 1Y
- 11.47%
- 3Y*
- 15.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.42%
FIKBX
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 19.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.85%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
ICFSX vs. FIKBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICFSX ICON Consumer Select Fund | 4.33% | 5.96% | 35.19% | 18.16% | -10.30% | 22.79% | -7.47% | 36.93% | -16.09% |
FIKBX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z | 9.88% | 15.36% | 32.80% | 14.47% | -8.58% | 33.43% | 0.18% | 34.31% | -11.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICFSX and FIKBX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ICFSX and FIKBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICFSX vs. FIKBX — Risk / Return Rank
ICFSX
FIKBX
ICFSX vs. FIKBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON Consumer Select Fund (ICFSX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICFSX | FIKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.19 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 1.29 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.14 | 3.72 | -1.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICFSX vs. FIKBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICFSX drawdown since its inception was -77.40%, which is greater than FIKBX's maximum drawdown of -45.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICFSX and FIKBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICFSX | FIKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.40% | -45.95% | -31.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -12.96% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.61% | -19.38% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.27% | -24.82% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -0.74% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.26% | -7.96% | -13.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 4.50% | +0.39% |
Volatility
ICFSX vs. FIKBX - Volatility Comparison
ICON Consumer Select Fund (ICFSX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) have volatilities of 4.60% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICFSX | FIKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 4.83% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | 12.27% | -1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.30% | 16.19% | -1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.36% | 20.54% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.61% | 25.76% | -2.15% |
ICFSX vs. FIKBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICFSX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKBX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICFSX vs. FIKBX - Dividend Comparison
ICFSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%, more than FIKBX's 6.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKBX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z | 6.47% | 7.11% | 5.04% | 2.48% | 6.20% | 4.43% | 2.78% | 1.59% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICFSX ICON Consumer Select Fund | 10.78% | 11.25% | 34.59% | 7.32% | 17.71% | 10.98% | 0.00% | 1.94% | 0.75% | 0.21% | 0.97% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICFSX and FIKBX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIKBX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to ICFSX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICFSX dropped -77.40% vs FIKBX's -45.95%.
FIKBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICFSX and FIKBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer