ICDU.L vs. XLYP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ICDU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XLYP.L (Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - ICDU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary Index while XLYP.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICDU.L returned 13.79%/yr vs 13.68%/yr for XLYP.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ICDU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLYP.L.

Performance

ICDU.L vs. XLYP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L) and Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICDU.L achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly higher than XLYP.L's -2.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ICDU.L having a 13.79% annualized return and XLYP.L not far behind at 13.68%.

ICDU.L

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: -0.52%
• 6M: 0.18%
• 1Y: 13.34%
• 3Y*: 14.04%
• 5Y*: 9.32%
• 10Y*: 13.79%

XLYP.L

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: -2.69%
• 6M: -1.86%
• 1Y: 10.71%
• 3Y*: 12.55%
• 5Y*: 9.67%
• 10Y*: 13.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICDU.L vs. XLYP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ICDU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	-0.52%	-0.77%	33.05%	35.72%	-29.67%	25.98%	28.95%	22.82%	5.56%	11.41%
XLYP.L Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF	-2.69%	0.23%	30.67%	32.31%	-26.14%	30.65%	22.15%	24.16%	6.23%	11.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ICDU.L and XLYP.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015	0.98

The correlation between ICDU.L and XLYP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

ICDU.L vs. XLYP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ICDU.L	XLYP.L
Consumer Cyclical	97.6%	98.8%
Communication Services	1.3%	-
Technology	0.8%	1.0%
Industrials	0.1%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ICDU.L vs. XLYP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICDU.L

ICDU.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
ICDU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
ICDU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
ICDU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
ICDU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
ICDU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22

XLYP.L

XLYP.L Risk / Return Rank: 20
XLYP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
XLYP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
XLYP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 20
XLYP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
XLYP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICDU.L vs. XLYP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L) and Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ICDU.L	XLYP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	0.68	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	1.06	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.12	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	0.84	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.61	2.32	+0.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICDU.L vs. XLYP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICDU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the XLYP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICDU.L and XLYP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICDU.L	XLYP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80	0.68	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.47	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.69	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.75	-0.09

Drawdowns

ICDU.L vs. XLYP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICDU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.84%, which is greater than XLYP.L's maximum drawdown of -30.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICDU.L and XLYP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICDU.L	XLYP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.84%	-30.40%	-3.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.03%	-12.73%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.64%	-26.52%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.84%	-30.40%	-3.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.84%	-30.40%	-3.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.81%	-6.66%	+0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.67%	-6.54%	-1.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.10%	4.60%	+0.50%

Volatility

ICDU.L vs. XLYP.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L) and Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) have volatilities of 5.13% and 5.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICDU.L	XLYP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.13%	5.00%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.59%	11.81%	+0.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.68%	15.81%	+0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.06%	20.40%	+0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.15%	19.86%	+0.29%

ICDU.L vs. XLYP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICDU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLYP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ICDU.L vs. XLYP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ICDU.L nor XLYP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICDU.L and XLYP.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, ICDU.L and XLYP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ICDU.L or XLYP.L?

On fees, XLYP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICDU.L or XLYP.L?

XLYP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ICDU.L.

What is the main difference between ICDU.L and XLYP.L?

ICDU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary Index, while XLYP.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ICDU.L and 0.14% for XLYP.L.