PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICDU.L vs. IUIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICDU.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ICDU.L is traded in GBp, while IUIT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUIT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICDU.L achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 26.17% return. Over the past 10 years, ICDU.L has underperformed IUIT.L with an annualized return of 13.79%, while IUIT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.54% annualized return.


ICDU.L

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
-0.52%
6M
0.18%
1Y
13.34%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
13.79%

IUIT.L

1D
0.00%
1M
16.60%
YTD
26.17%
6M
24.49%
1Y
56.60%
3Y*
31.96%
5Y*
26.05%
10Y*
27.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICDU.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICDU.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-0.52%-0.77%33.05%35.72%-29.67%25.98%28.95%22.82%5.56%11.41%
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
23.54%14.17%40.92%51.48%-20.73%35.36%38.94%43.23%4.43%25.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ICDU.L and IUIT.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2015

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between ICDU.L and IUIT.L has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ICDU.L vs. IUIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ICDU.L
IUIT.L

Consumer Cyclical

97.6%

-

Communication Services

1.3%

-

Technology

0.8%
99.6%

Industrials

0.1%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

ICDU.L
97.6%
IUIT.L

-

Communication Services

ICDU.L
1.3%
IUIT.L

-

Technology

ICDU.L
0.8%
IUIT.L
99.6%

Industrials

ICDU.L
0.1%
IUIT.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

ICDU.L

-

IUIT.L

-

Consumer Defensive

ICDU.L

-

IUIT.L

-

Energy

ICDU.L

-

IUIT.L
0.1%

Financial Services

ICDU.L

-

IUIT.L

-

Healthcare

ICDU.L

-

IUIT.L

-

Real Estate

ICDU.L

-

IUIT.L

-

Utilities

ICDU.L

-

IUIT.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICDU.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICDU.L
ICDU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
ICDU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICDU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICDU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ICDU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICDU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

IUIT.L
IUIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICDU.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICDU.LIUIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.46

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

3.32

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.61

8.42

-5.81

ICDU.L vs. IUIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICDU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICDU.L and IUIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICDU.LIUIT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

2.78

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

1.14

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

1.26

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

1.24

-0.58

Drawdowns

ICDU.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICDU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.84%, which is greater than IUIT.L's maximum drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICDU.L and IUIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICDU.LIUIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.84%

-28.01%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.03%

-16.96%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.64%

-28.01%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.84%

-28.01%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.84%

-28.01%

-5.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.81%

-0.78%

-5.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-5.29%

-2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.10%

6.70%

-1.60%

Volatility

ICDU.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L) is 5.13%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that ICDU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICDU.LIUIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

7.16%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.59%

15.20%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

20.23%

-3.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.06%

22.82%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.15%

22.51%

-2.36%

ICDU.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ICDU.L and IUIT.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ICDU.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ICDU.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ICDU.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICDU.L and IUIT.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

ICDU.L is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. ICDU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary Index, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICDU.L and IUIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer