ICCIX vs. GSINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Dynamic International Opportunity Fund (ICCIX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX).
ICCIX is managed by Innealta Capital. It was launched on Dec 30, 2011. GSINX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 14, 2016.
Performance
ICCIX vs. GSINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICCIX vs. GSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICCIX Dynamic International Opportunity Fund | -0.42% | 26.98% | 2.33% | 10.95% | -13.47% | 1.05% | 27.19% | 6.62% | -14.22% | 22.43% |
GSINX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund | 3.75% | 20.76% | 9.53% | 21.93% | -11.14% | 12.35% | 15.64% | 27.41% | -6.14% | 29.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICCIX achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly lower than GSINX's 3.75% return.
ICCIX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -11.55%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 4.72%
- 1Y
- 20.65%
- 3Y*
- 11.28%
- 5Y*
- 4.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.68%
GSINX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 15.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICCIX vs. GSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICCIX has a 1.62% expense ratio, which is higher than GSINX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICCIX vs. GSINX — Risk / Return Rank
ICCIX
GSINX
ICCIX vs. GSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic International Opportunity Fund (ICCIX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICCIX | GSINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 1.27 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 1.68 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.27 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 1.80 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.06 | 7.33 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICCIX | GSINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 1.27 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.72 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.80 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICCIX and GSINX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ICCIX vs. GSINX - Dividend Comparison
ICCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than GSINX's 4.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICCIX Dynamic International Opportunity Fund | 4.11% | 4.09% | 7.11% | 2.35% | 1.28% | 0.88% | 0.80% | 1.71% | 1.97% | 1.60% | 1.90% | 2.01% |
GSINX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund | 4.85% | 5.03% | 11.11% | 2.27% | 4.79% | 2.13% | 0.08% | 0.57% | 0.43% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ICCIX vs. GSINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICCIX drawdown since its inception was -28.83%, roughly equal to the maximum GSINX drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICCIX and GSINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICCIX | GSINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.83% | -28.80% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.85% | -8.74% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.97% | -25.46% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.66% | -6.11% | -5.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.53% | -4.88% | -1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.15% | +0.89% |
Volatility
ICCIX vs. GSINX - Volatility Comparison
Dynamic International Opportunity Fund (ICCIX) has a higher volatility of 8.17% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) at 4.84%. This indicates that ICCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICCIX | GSINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.17% | 4.84% | +3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 7.38% | +4.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 12.48% | +3.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.32% | 14.44% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 15.78% | -1.92% |