PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICBU.L vs. VNRT.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICBU.L vs. VNRT.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF (ICBU.L) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (VNRT.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ICBU.L is traded in USD, while VNRT.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VNRT.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICBU.L achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than VNRT.AS's 9.92% return.


ICBU.L

1D
0.20%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.86%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
5.47%
5Y*
1.73%
10Y*

VNRT.AS

1D
0.03%
1M
4.64%
YTD
9.92%
6M
11.03%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
13.28%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICBU.L vs. VNRT.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICBU.L
iShares USD Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF
0.45%7.60%4.08%6.74%-9.04%-1.35%6.50%9.92%-0.45%1.36%
VNRT.AS
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF
9.92%19.16%24.78%25.56%-19.72%28.77%19.02%30.45%-5.74%13.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ICBU.L and VNRT.AS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017

0.11

The correlation between ICBU.L and VNRT.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICBU.L vs. VNRT.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICBU.L
ICBU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
ICBU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICBU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICBU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ICBU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICBU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VNRT.AS
VNRT.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VNRT.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNRT.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNRT.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VNRT.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNRT.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICBU.L vs. VNRT.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF (ICBU.L) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (VNRT.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICBU.LVNRT.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.44

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.09

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

13.26

-4.71

ICBU.L vs. VNRT.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICBU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the VNRT.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICBU.L and VNRT.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICBU.LVNRT.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

2.40

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.82

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.44

+0.17

Drawdowns

ICBU.L vs. VNRT.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICBU.L drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, smaller than the maximum VNRT.AS drawdown of -34.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICBU.L and VNRT.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICBU.LVNRT.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.92%

-34.82%

+20.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.14%

-8.78%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.24%

-19.23%

+15.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.92%

-25.21%

+11.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.46%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-8.05%

+5.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

2.06%

-1.49%

Volatility

ICBU.L vs. VNRT.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF (ICBU.L) is 1.35%, while Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (VNRT.AS) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that ICBU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNRT.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICBU.LVNRT.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

2.81%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

7.97%

-5.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03%

11.33%

-8.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.31%

15.93%

-11.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.42%

17.58%

-13.16%

ICBU.L vs. VNRT.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICBU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VNRT.AS's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ICBU.L vs. VNRT.AS - Dividend Comparison

ICBU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, more than VNRT.AS's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICBU.L
iShares USD Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF
5.54%4.21%3.78%2.77%1.93%1.93%2.78%2.93%2.65%0.44%0.00%0.00%
VNRT.AS
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF
0.88%0.98%0.99%1.25%1.45%1.00%1.42%1.44%1.77%1.64%1.58%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICBU.L and VNRT.AS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VNRT.AS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VNRT.AS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ICBU.L.

ICBU.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VNRT.AS is Large Cap Blend Equities. ICBU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while VNRT.AS tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ICBU.L and 0.10% for VNRT.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICBU.L and VNRT.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer