PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICAFX vs. FDSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICAFX vs. FDSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2 (ICAFX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICAFX achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly lower than FDSSX's 14.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ICAFX has underperformed FDSSX with an annualized return of 13.82%, while FDSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.84% annualized return.


ICAFX

1D
1.46%
1M
-1.10%
6M
6.45%
YTD
8.27%
1Y
17.16%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*
13.82%
ALL TIME*
11.52%

FDSSX

1D
1.87%
1M
-0.79%
6M
11.52%
YTD
14.50%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
12.00%
10Y*
14.84%
ALL TIME*
11.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ICAFX vs. FDSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICAFX
American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2
8.27%20.69%25.14%28.82%-15.32%25.35%14.70%24.32%-8.02%19.75%
FDSSX
Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund
14.50%18.89%19.79%26.94%-19.55%23.14%24.90%32.21%-8.61%24.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ICAFX and FDSSX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2008

0.96

The correlation between ICAFX and FDSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICAFX vs. FDSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ICAFX
ICAFX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ICAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ICAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FDSSX
FDSSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FDSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ICAFX vs. FDSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2 (ICAFX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICAFXFDSSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.33

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

2.83

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.50

12.79

-6.29

ICAFX vs. FDSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the FDSSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICAFX and FDSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICAFX vs. FDSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICAFX drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, smaller than the maximum FDSSX drawdown of -56.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICAFX and FDSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICAFXFDSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.84%

-56.77%

+13.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-9.19%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.39%

-20.86%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.21%

-25.22%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.07%

-34.37%

+3.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-2.29%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-9.85%

+4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.03%

+0.33%

Volatility

ICAFX vs. FDSSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2 (ICAFX) is 3.36%, while Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that ICAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICAFXFDSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

3.73%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.63%

11.38%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.41%

14.26%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

17.90%

-1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

18.58%

-1.99%

ICAFX vs. FDSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICAFX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than FDSSX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICAFX vs. FDSSX - Dividend Comparison

ICAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.45%, more than FDSSX's 4.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDSSX
Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund
4.18%4.79%4.83%2.03%0.36%0.84%5.22%6.09%4.46%3.07%1.04%5.16%
ICAFX
American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2
9.45%10.79%9.49%5.15%6.33%7.14%1.84%6.34%9.84%7.25%5.67%9.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, ICAFX and FDSSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDSSX has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to ICAFX (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICAFX dropped -42.84% vs FDSSX's -56.77%.

FDSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICAFX and FDSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer