ICAE.TO vs. QQCI.TO
ICAE.TO (Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF) and QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICAE.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index, while QQCI.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ICAE.TO returned 16.60% vs 31.57% for QQCI.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ICAE.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ICAE.TO having a 16.94% return and QQCI.TO slightly lower at 16.93%.
ICAE.TO
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 4.66%
- 6M
- 16.72%
- YTD
- 16.94%
- 1Y
- 16.60%
- 3Y*
- 16.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQCI.TO
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 17.45%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 1Y
- 31.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICAE.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ICAE.TO Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF | 16.94% | 10.02% | 6.50% |
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 16.93% | 12.64% | 11.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICAE.TO and QQCI.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2024 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICAE.TO vs. QQCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ICAE.TO
QQCI.TO
ICAE.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF (ICAE.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICAE.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.40 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 4.16 | -3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.02 | 14.27 | -12.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICAE.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICAE.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.49%, smaller than the maximum QQCI.TO drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICAE.TO and QQCI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICAE.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.49% | -18.95% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.49% | -7.62% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -1.69% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -3.03% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.22% | 2.22% | +6.00% |
Volatility
ICAE.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF (ICAE.TO) is 2.22%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that ICAE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICAE.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.22% | 6.48% | -4.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.91% | 11.03% | -3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.70% | 14.25% | +5.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 15.87% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 15.87% | +0.16% |
Dividends
ICAE.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Dividend Comparison
ICAE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than QQCI.TO's 8.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ICAE.TO Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF | 2.74% | 3.29% | 3.33% | 2.87% |
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 8.75% | 9.34% | 3.17% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICAE.TO and QQCI.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICAE.TO is categorized as Dividend, while QQCI.TO is Nasdaq-100. ICAE.TO tracks S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index, while QQCI.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index.
Find the right allocation for ICAE.TO and QQCI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer