PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBZL.L vs. LEER.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBZL.L vs. LEER.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L) and Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBZL.L is traded in GBp, while LEER.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LEER.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBZL.L achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly lower than LEER.DE's 18.65% return. Over the past 10 years, IBZL.L has underperformed LEER.DE with an annualized return of 8.53%, while LEER.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.62% annualized return.


IBZL.L

1D
4.32%
1M
-6.39%
YTD
11.37%
6M
10.30%
1Y
33.52%
3Y*
6.71%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
8.53%

LEER.DE

1D
3.15%
1M
4.63%
YTD
18.65%
6M
22.25%
1Y
48.33%
3Y*
31.96%
5Y*
17.32%
10Y*
12.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBZL.L vs. LEER.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBZL.L
iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist)
11.37%35.97%-27.18%23.72%28.39%-20.69%-17.23%14.49%2.68%14.31%
LEER.DE
Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF
18.65%61.96%-0.41%38.88%-16.86%11.92%-13.81%-3.97%-7.08%36.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IBZL.L and LEER.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBZL.L vs. LEER.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBZL.L
IBZL.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IBZL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBZL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBZL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IBZL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBZL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

LEER.DE
LEER.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LEER.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBZL.L vs. LEER.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L) and Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBZL.LLEER.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

5.10

-3.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

13.52

-7.59

IBZL.L vs. LEER.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBZL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the LEER.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBZL.L and LEER.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBZL.L vs. LEER.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBZL.L drawdown since its inception was -71.99%, which is greater than LEER.DE's maximum drawdown of -65.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBZL.L and LEER.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBZL.LLEER.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.99%

-65.08%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.97%

-9.43%

-9.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.80%

-13.65%

-15.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.80%

-41.90%

+13.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.07%

-48.43%

-3.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.98%

-0.10%

-14.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.70%

-24.06%

-3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

3.56%

+2.07%

Volatility

IBZL.L vs. LEER.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L) has a higher volatility of 6.95% compared to Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE) at 6.44%. This indicates that IBZL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEER.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBZL.LLEER.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.95%

6.44%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.60%

17.43%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.76%

21.28%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.42%

23.49%

+2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.47%

22.10%

+9.37%

IBZL.L vs. LEER.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBZL.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than LEER.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBZL.L vs. LEER.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBZL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, while LEER.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBZL.L
iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.26%4.32%6.46%5.44%13.60%6.32%1.92%2.53%2.45%1.46%1.64%3.54%
LEER.DE
Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBZL.L and LEER.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LEER.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LEER.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBZL.L.

IBZL.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while LEER.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. IBZL.L tracks MSCI Brazil NR USD, while LEER.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Eastern Europe ex Russia Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IBZL.L and 0.50% for LEER.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBZL.L and LEER.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer