IBUF vs. UXJL
IBUF (Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
IBUF vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBUF achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.
IBUF
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 5.20%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- 1Y
- 11.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBUF vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBUF Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly | 5.20% | 5.52% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 11.78% | 9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBUF and UXJL is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBUF vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank
IBUF
UXJL
IBUF vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (IBUF) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBUF | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.40 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBUF | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.73 | 1.87 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
IBUF vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBUF drawdown since its inception was -5.92%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBUF and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBUF | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -10.29% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.76% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.47% | -1.51% | +1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | — | — |
Volatility
IBUF vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBUF | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.40% | 13.90% | -8.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.53% | 13.90% | -7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.53% | 13.90% | -7.37% |
IBUF vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IBUF and UXJL have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
IBUF vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBUF nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBUF and UXJL have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBUF and UXJL have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
IBUF and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust.
Find the right allocation for IBUF and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer