PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBUF vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBUF vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (IBUF) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBUF achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -5.14% return.


IBUF

1D
0.55%
1M
0.71%
YTD
6.33%
6M
6.08%
1Y
12.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMST

1D
18.45%
1M
181.70%
YTD
-5.14%
6M
2.86%
1Y
236.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBUF vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBUF and SMST is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBUF vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBUF
IBUF Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBUF vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (IBUF) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBUFSMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.30

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

2.79

+2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.28

5.52

+13.77

IBUF vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBUF Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBUF and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBUF vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBUF drawdown since its inception was -5.92%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBUF and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBUFSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.92%

-99.25%

+93.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.17%

-85.39%

+83.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-96.27%

+95.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-90.74%

+90.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

43.15%

-42.51%

Volatility

IBUF vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (IBUF) is 3.08%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 46.13%. This indicates that IBUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBUFSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

46.13%

-43.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.31%

130.40%

-125.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.10%

146.32%

-140.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.75%

167.25%

-160.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.75%

167.25%

-160.50%

IBUF vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBUF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBUF vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBUF nor SMST has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IBUF and SMST have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (46.13%) compared to IBUF (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBUF dropped -5.92% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 236.89% vs 12.30% for IBUF. On fees, IBUF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, IBUF has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 236.89% return vs 12.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBUF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

IBUF and SMST have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

IBUF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IBUF and 1.29% for SMST.

IBUF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBUF and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer