IBUF vs. FMAR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBUF (Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and FMAR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IBUF returned 11.79% vs 19.13% for FMAR. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

IBUF vs. FMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (IBUF) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBUF achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly lower than FMAR's 10.02% return.

IBUF

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: 5.20%
• 6M: 6.89%
• 1Y: 11.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FMAR

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 10.02%
• 6M: 11.01%
• 1Y: 19.13%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: 10.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBUF vs. FMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IBUF Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	5.20%	13.54%	2.77%
FMAR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March	10.02%	9.69%	6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IBUF and FMAR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024	0.62

The correlation between IBUF and FMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

IBUF vs. FMAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IBUF	FMAR
Financial Services	24.7%	11.9%
Industrials	19.8%	8.1%
Healthcare	10.6%	8.4%
Technology	10.3%	36.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	4.9%
Basic Materials	5.9%	1.8%
Communication Services	4.5%	10.9%
Energy	4.0%	3.5%
Utilities	4.0%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

IBUF vs. FMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBUF

IBUF Risk / Return Rank: 80
IBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
IBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 76
IBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
IBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FMAR

FMAR Risk / Return Rank: 96
FMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBUF vs. FMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (IBUF) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBUF	FMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	3.79	-1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	6.08	-2.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.94	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.46	8.14	-2.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.40	56.00	-36.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBUF vs. FMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBUF Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the FMAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBUF and FMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBUF	FMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	3.79	-1.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.73	1.10	+0.63

Drawdowns

IBUF vs. FMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBUF drawdown since its inception was -5.92%, smaller than the maximum FMAR drawdown of -14.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBUF and FMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBUF	FMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.92%	-14.36%	+8.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.17%	-2.36%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-0.21%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.47%	-2.14%	+1.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.61%	0.34%	+0.27%

Volatility

IBUF vs. FMAR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (IBUF) has a higher volatility of 2.44% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) at 0.98%. This indicates that IBUF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBUF	FMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.44%	0.98%	+1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.60%	3.95%	+0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.40%	5.08%	+0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.53%	10.45%	-3.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.53%	10.35%	-3.82%

IBUF vs. FMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBUF and FMAR have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

IBUF vs. FMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBUF nor FMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBUF and FMAR in my portfolio?

IBUF and FMAR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBUF or FMAR?

IBUF has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to FMAR (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBUF dropped -5.92% vs FMAR's -14.36%.

Which ETF is better, IBUF or FMAR?

On 1-year performance, FMAR leads with 19.13% vs 11.79% for IBUF. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, FMAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBUF or FMAR?

Over the 1-year period, FMAR has performed better with a 19.13% return vs 11.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBUF or FMAR?

IBUF and FMAR have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBUF or FMAR?

IBUF and FMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IBUF and FMAR?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.79 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.