IBUF vs. FFTY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBUF (Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBUF is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. IBUF is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. Over the past year, IBUF returned 11.79% vs 38.14% for FFTY. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBUF charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.

Performance

IBUF vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (IBUF) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBUF achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 20.11% return.

IBUF

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: 5.20%
• 6M: 6.89%
• 1Y: 11.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFTY

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 7.67%
• YTD: 20.11%
• 6M: 21.02%
• 1Y: 38.14%
• 3Y*: 21.57%
• 5Y*: -0.60%
• 10Y*: 7.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBUF vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IBUF Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	5.20%	13.54%	2.77%
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	20.11%	23.38%	3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between IBUF and FFTY is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024	0.50

IBUF vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IBUF	FFTY
Financial Services	24.7%	13.1%
Industrials	19.8%	26.6%
Healthcare	10.6%	12.1%
Technology	10.3%	24.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	-
Basic Materials	5.9%	21.6%
Communication Services	4.5%	3.7%
Energy	4.0%	8.0%
Utilities	4.0%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

IBUF vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBUF

IBUF Risk / Return Rank: 80
IBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
IBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 76
IBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
IBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FFTY

FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 30
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBUF vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (IBUF) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBUF	FFTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	1.12	+1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	1.55	+1.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.20	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.46	1.65	+3.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.40	4.36	+15.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBUF vs. FFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBUF Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the FFTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBUF and FFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBUF	FFTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	1.12	+1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.73	0.20	+1.54

Drawdowns

IBUF vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBUF drawdown since its inception was -5.92%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBUF and FFTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBUF	FFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.92%	-59.46%	+53.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.17%	-23.29%	+21.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-59.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-15.34%	+14.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.47%	-22.38%	+21.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.61%	8.77%	-8.16%

Volatility

IBUF vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (IBUF) is 2.44%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 9.42%. This indicates that IBUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBUF	FFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.44%	9.42%	-6.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.60%	26.18%	-21.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.40%	34.09%	-28.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.53%	29.14%	-22.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.53%	27.41%	-20.88%

IBUF vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBUF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBUF vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

IBUF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	1.12%	1.35%	0.91%	0.65%	2.75%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%
IBUF Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBUF and FFTY in my portfolio?

IBUF and FFTY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBUF or FFTY?

FFTY has higher volatility (9.42%) compared to IBUF (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBUF dropped -5.92% vs FFTY's -59.46%.

Which ETF is better, IBUF or FFTY?

On 1-year performance, FFTY leads with 38.14% vs 11.79% for IBUF. On fees, FFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, IBUF has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBUF or FFTY?

Over the 1-year period, FFTY has performed better with a 38.14% return vs 11.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBUF or FFTY?

FFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IBUF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBUF or FFTY?

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for IBUF.

What is the main difference between IBUF and FFTY?

IBUF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IBUF and 0.80% for FFTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBUF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.