IBTS.L vs. UB82.L
IBTS.L (iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF) and UB82.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Government Bonds funds - IBTS.L tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index while UB82.L tracks the Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBTS.L returned 1.72%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for UB82.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBTS.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for UB82.L.
Performance
IBTS.L vs. UB82.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IBTS.L is traded in GBP, while UB82.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UB82.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTS.L achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly higher than UB82.L's 2.02% return. Over the past 10 years, IBTS.L has outperformed UB82.L with an annualized return of 1.72%, while UB82.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.43% annualized return.
IBTS.L
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- 6.32%
- 3Y*
- 3.01%
- 5Y*
- 2.97%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
UB82.L
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 2.75%
- 1Y
- 5.88%
- 3Y*
- 1.22%
- 5Y*
- -0.10%
- 10Y*
- 0.43%
IBTS.L vs. UB82.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTS.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF | 2.46% | -1.91% | 5.79% | -1.41% | 7.61% | 0.64% | -0.34% | 0.37% | 7.21% | -8.60% |
UB82.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 2.02% | -0.40% | 1.34% | -2.28% | -4.86% | -1.84% | 5.95% | 5.47% | 6.36% | -6.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTS.L and UB82.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.81 |
The correlation between IBTS.L and UB82.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (3 years) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTS.L vs. UB82.L — Risk / Return Rank
IBTS.L
UB82.L
IBTS.L vs. UB82.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB82.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBTS.L | UB82.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.17 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.21 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.58 | 2.94 | +0.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBTS.L vs. UB82.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.85%, smaller than the maximum UB82.L drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTS.L and UB82.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTS.L | UB82.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.85% | -44.55% | +20.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.51% | -4.86% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.89% | -7.79% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.29% | -16.40% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.02% | -27.42% | +8.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.85% | -21.47% | +15.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.16% | -23.84% | +12.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 1.99% | -0.22% |
Volatility
IBTS.L vs. UB82.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB82.L) have volatilities of 1.53% and 1.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTS.L | UB82.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.53% | 1.51% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.54% | 4.38% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.14% | 5.96% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.09% | 9.43% | -1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.75% | 10.06% | -1.31% |
IBTS.L vs. UB82.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than UB82.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBTS.L vs. UB82.L - Dividend Comparison
IBTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than UB82.L's 3.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTS.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF | 3.92% | 4.22% | 4.12% | 3.08% | 0.75% | 0.61% | 1.84% | 2.39% | 1.49% | 1.01% | 0.67% | 0.49% |
UB82.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 3.04% | 2.20% | 2.49% | 2.80% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.82% | 1.98% | 2.70% | 1.92% | 0.84% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IBTS.L and UB82.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, UB82.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UB82.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTS.L.
IBTS.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, while UB82.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTS.L and 0.05% for UB82.L.
Find the right allocation for IBTS.L and UB82.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer