IBTR vs. SLV
IBTR (iShares iBonds Dec 2036 Term Treasury ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2036 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IBTR charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
IBTR vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBTR
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SLV
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- 6M
- -30.59%
- YTD
- -18.72%
- 1Y
- 55.88%
- 3Y*
- 32.93%
- 5Y*
- 17.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $481.12K | $362.65K | $277.01K | |
| $716.70M | $772.79M | $1.26B |
IBTR vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBTR iShares iBonds Dec 2036 Term Treasury ETF | -1.13% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -19.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTR and SLV is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTR vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
IBTR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SLV
IBTR vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2036 Term Treasury ETF (IBTR) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBTR | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.10 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.10 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBTR vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTR drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTR and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTR | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -76.28% | +73.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -52.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -52.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -50.42% | +48.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.07% | -44.68% | +43.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 27.31% | — |
Volatility
IBTR vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTR | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 55.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.28% | 61.35% | -56.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.28% | 36.97% | -31.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.28% | 32.22% | -26.94% |
IBTR vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTR has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBTR vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
IBTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
IBTR iShares iBonds Dec 2036 Term Treasury ETF | 1.01% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTR and SLV have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTR is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTR is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IBTR has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
IBTR is categorized as Government Bonds, while SLV is Silver. IBTR tracks ICE 2036 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTR and 0.50% for SLV.
Find the right allocation for IBTR and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer