PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTQ vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTQ vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF (IBTQ) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTQ achieves a -1.30% return, which is significantly lower than UUP's 5.25% return.


IBTQ

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.71%
6M
-0.92%
YTD
-1.30%
1Y
2.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.80%

UUP

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.32%
6M
4.33%
YTD
5.25%
1Y
8.57%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
3.05%
ALL TIME*
1.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$684.52K$774.96K$2.09M
$55.76M$56.95M$59.82M

IBTQ vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBTQ and UUP is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

-0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTQ vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTQ
IBTQ Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IBTQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTQ vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF (IBTQ) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTQUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.26

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

2.36

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.25

6.51

-5.26

IBTQ vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTQ and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTQ vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTQ drawdown since its inception was -4.27%, smaller than the maximum UUP drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTQ and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTQUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.27%

-22.19%

+17.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-3.65%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-1.44%

-2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-8.87%

+7.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.32%

+0.39%

Volatility

IBTQ vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF (IBTQ) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) have volatilities of 1.33% and 1.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTQUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

1.30%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.69%

4.31%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.92%

5.98%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.56%

7.22%

-1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.56%

6.90%

-1.34%

IBTQ vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTQ has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBTQ vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

IBTQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than UUP's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBTQ
iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF
3.75%2.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.26%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTQ and UUP have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBTQ has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to UUP (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTQ dropped -4.27% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 1-year performance, UUP leads with 8.57% vs 2.14% for IBTQ. On fees, IBTQ is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UUP has performed better with a 8.57% return vs 2.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBTQ is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

IBTQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 3.26% for UUP.

IBTQ is categorized as Government Bonds, while UUP is Currency. IBTQ tracks ICE 2035 Maturity US Treasury Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTQ and 0.75% for UUP.

UUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTQ and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer