PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTQ vs. GOVZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTQ vs. GOVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF (IBTQ) and iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTQ achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than GOVZ's 3.57% return.


IBTQ

1D
0.66%
1M
1.25%
YTD
0.16%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOVZ

1D
2.29%
1M
6.77%
YTD
3.57%
6M
1.48%
1Y
4.27%
3Y*
-6.85%
5Y*
-11.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTQ vs. GOVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBTQ and GOVZ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

0.84

The correlation between IBTQ and GOVZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTQ vs. GOVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTQ
IBTQ Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
IBTQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

GOVZ
GOVZ Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GOVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GOVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTQ vs. GOVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF (IBTQ) and iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTQGOVZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.06

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.30

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.30

0.66

+1.64

IBTQ vs. GOVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the GOVZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTQ and GOVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTQ vs. GOVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTQ drawdown since its inception was -4.27%, smaller than the maximum GOVZ drawdown of -59.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTQ and GOVZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTQGOVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.27%

-59.65%

+55.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-14.16%

+9.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-54.49%

+52.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-40.04%

+38.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

6.51%

-4.94%

Volatility

IBTQ vs. GOVZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF (IBTQ) is 1.55%, while iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that IBTQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTQGOVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

4.06%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.66%

10.91%

-7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98%

15.89%

-10.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.63%

23.88%

-18.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.63%

23.29%

-17.66%

IBTQ vs. GOVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTQ has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GOVZ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTQ vs. GOVZ - Dividend Comparison

IBTQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than GOVZ's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GOVZ
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF
4.95%5.00%4.68%3.84%3.69%1.76%0.39%
IBTQ
iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF
3.69%2.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTQ and GOVZ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOVZ has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to IBTQ (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTQ dropped -4.27% vs GOVZ's -59.65%.

On 1-year performance, GOVZ leads with 4.27% vs 3.59% for IBTQ. On fees, IBTQ is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOVZ has performed better with a 4.27% return vs 3.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBTQ is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GOVZ.

GOVZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.95%, compared with 3.69% for IBTQ.

IBTQ tracks ICE 2035 Maturity US Treasury Index, while GOVZ tracks ICE BofA Long US Treasury Principal STRIPS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTQ and 0.15% for GOVZ.

IBTQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTQ and GOVZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer