IBTQ vs. ACWI
IBTQ (iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTQ is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2035 Maturity US Treasury Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBTQ returned 4.35% vs 29.24% for ACWI. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBTQ charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
IBTQ vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTQ achieves a -0.68% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.47% return.
IBTQ
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- -0.68%
- 6M
- -1.21%
- 1Y
- 4.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 13.07%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 21.38%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
IBTQ vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBTQ iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF | -0.68% | 5.09% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 12.47% | 21.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTQ and ACWI is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTQ vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
IBTQ
ACWI
IBTQ vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF (IBTQ) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTQ | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.42 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 3.02 | -2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.06 | 13.55 | -10.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTQ | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 2.30 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.43 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
IBTQ vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTQ drawdown since its inception was -4.27%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTQ and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTQ | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -56.00% | +51.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.27% | -9.73% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | -0.53% | -2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -8.61% | +7.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 2.16% | -0.73% |
Volatility
IBTQ vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF (IBTQ) is 1.60%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that IBTQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTQ | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | 3.83% | -2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.47% | 10.30% | -6.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.02% | 12.79% | -7.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 16.05% | -10.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 17.11% | -11.49% |
IBTQ vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTQ has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBTQ vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
IBTQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
IBTQ iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF | 3.72% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTQ and ACWI have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWI has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to IBTQ (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTQ dropped -4.27% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
On 1-year performance, ACWI leads with 29.24% vs 4.35% for IBTQ. On fees, IBTQ is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 29.24% return vs 4.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBTQ is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
IBTQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.
IBTQ is categorized as Government Bonds, while ACWI is Global Equities. IBTQ tracks ICE 2035 Maturity US Treasury Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTQ and 0.32% for ACWI.
ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBTQ and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer