PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTM.L vs. PRIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTM.L vs. PRIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBTM.L is traded in GBP, while PRIT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PRIT.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTM.L achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly lower than PRIT.L's 2.26% return.


IBTM.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.87%
YTD
1.89%
6M
2.85%
1Y
7.04%
3Y*
1.69%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
0.63%

PRIT.L

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.68%
YTD
2.26%
6M
3.00%
1Y
6.68%
3Y*
1.75%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTM.L vs. PRIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.89%0.89%1.46%-2.26%-4.74%-1.77%6.02%7.48%
PRIT.L
Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)
2.26%-1.06%2.58%-1.73%-1.78%-0.98%4.03%-18.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTM.L and PRIT.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2019

0.96

The correlation between IBTM.L and PRIT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTM.L vs. PRIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTM.L
IBTM.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IBTM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

PRIT.L
PRIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PRIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTM.L vs. PRIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTM.LPRIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.19

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

2.98

-0.07

IBTM.L vs. PRIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the PRIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTM.L and PRIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTM.L vs. PRIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTM.L drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than PRIT.L's maximum drawdown of -24.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTM.L and PRIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTM.LPRIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.39%

-24.81%

-27.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.57%

-5.19%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.57%

-8.19%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.29%

-16.09%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.54%

-16.72%

-2.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.63%

-17.37%

-3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.23%

+0.18%

Volatility

IBTM.L vs. PRIT.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIT.L) have volatilities of 1.70% and 1.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTM.LPRIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

1.70%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.66%

4.52%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.27%

6.09%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.46%

8.68%

+0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.03%

12.86%

-2.83%

IBTM.L vs. PRIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTM.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PRIT.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTM.L vs. PRIT.L - Dividend Comparison

IBTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than PRIT.L's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.26%4.19%3.94%3.16%1.96%1.14%1.69%2.53%2.34%2.02%1.79%1.97%
PRIT.L
Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)
3.15%3.22%2.79%2.34%1.88%1.74%2.11%1.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IBTM.L and PRIT.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PRIT.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRIT.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTM.L.

IBTM.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while PRIT.L tracks Solactive US Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTM.L and 0.05% for PRIT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTM.L and PRIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer