PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTM.L vs. IBTA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTM.L vs. IBTA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBTM.L is traded in GBP, while IBTA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBTA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTM.L achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly lower than IBTA.L's 2.76% return.


IBTM.L

1D
0.76%
1M
3.58%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.99%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
1.77%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
1.05%

IBTA.L

1D
0.35%
1M
2.27%
YTD
2.76%
6M
3.36%
1Y
6.47%
3Y*
3.09%
5Y*
2.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTM.L vs. IBTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.03%0.89%1.46%-2.26%-4.74%-1.77%6.02%5.50%6.50%-7.08%
IBTA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
2.76%-2.17%5.89%-1.00%7.69%0.30%0.11%-0.32%7.41%-7.63%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTM.L and IBTA.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2017

0.67

The correlation between IBTM.L and IBTA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTM.L vs. IBTA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTM.L
IBTM.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IBTM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTA.L
IBTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IBTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTM.L vs. IBTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTM.LIBTA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.18

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

1.21

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.95

3.33

-0.38

IBTM.L vs. IBTA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the IBTA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTM.L and IBTA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTM.L vs. IBTA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTM.L drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than IBTA.L's maximum drawdown of -18.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTM.L and IBTA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTM.LIBTA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.39%

-18.45%

-33.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.57%

-5.34%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.57%

-9.28%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.29%

-16.66%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.43%

-6.07%

-13.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.63%

-9.00%

-11.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

1.94%

+0.47%

Volatility

IBTM.L vs. IBTA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) at 1.56%. This indicates that IBTM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTM.LIBTA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

1.56%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.72%

5.03%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.31%

6.52%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.46%

8.28%

+1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.03%

8.54%

+1.49%

IBTM.L vs. IBTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBTM.L and IBTA.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTM.L vs. IBTA.L - Dividend Comparison

IBTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, while IBTA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.25%4.19%3.94%3.16%1.96%1.14%1.69%2.53%2.34%2.02%1.79%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTM.L and IBTA.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTM.L and IBTA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

IBTM.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while IBTA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTM.L and IBTA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer