PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTL vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTL vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTL achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.


IBTL

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
-0.47%
6M
-0.69%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
2.83%
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-2.76%
1M
-18.50%
YTD
-25.48%
6M
-29.84%
1Y
-38.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTL vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBTL
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF
-0.47%7.85%0.67%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-25.48%-6.41%99.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTL and IBIT is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTL vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTL
IBTL Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IBTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTL Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTL Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTL vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBTLIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

-0.89

+1.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

-1.23

+2.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.86

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

-0.79

+2.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.90

-1.36

+5.26

IBTL vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTL Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTL and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBTLIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

-0.89

+1.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

0.30

-0.50

Drawdowns

IBTL vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTL drawdown since its inception was -20.93%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTL and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTLIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.93%

-49.36%

+28.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-49.36%

+46.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.25%

-48.10%

+40.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.47%

-16.02%

+4.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

28.44%

-27.47%

Volatility

IBTL vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL) is 1.08%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that IBTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTLIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

9.50%

-8.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.39%

34.44%

-32.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62%

43.73%

-40.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.46%

50.19%

-42.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.46%

50.19%

-42.73%

IBTL vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTL has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTL vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

IBTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBTL
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF
3.97%3.93%4.07%3.04%2.36%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTL and IBIT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to IBTL (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTL dropped -20.93% vs IBIT's -49.36%.

On 1-year performance, IBTL leads with 3.77% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBTL is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTL has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBTL has performed better with a 3.77% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBTL is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

IBTL has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

IBTL is categorized as Government Bonds, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IBTL tracks ICE 2031 Maturity US Treasury Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTL and 0.25% for IBIT.

IBTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTL and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer