IBTL vs. IBDT
IBTL (iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF) and IBDT (iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2031 Maturity US Treasury Index, while IBDT is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg December 2028 Maturity Corporate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBTL returned 3.19%/yr vs 5.76%/yr for IBDT. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBTL charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBDT.
Performance
IBTL vs. IBDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTL achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly lower than IBDT's 0.92% return.
IBTL
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBDT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.76%
- 5Y*
- 1.25%
- 10Y*
- —
IBTL vs. IBDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTL iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF | -0.37% | 7.85% | 0.36% | 3.60% | -15.60% | -1.22% |
IBDT iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF | 0.92% | 7.02% | 3.97% | 7.72% | -11.42% | -1.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTL and IBDT is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between IBTL and IBDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTL vs. IBDT — Risk / Return Rank
IBTL
IBDT
IBTL vs. IBDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL) and iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBTL | IBDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.59 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 4.38 | -3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.19 | 20.12 | -16.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBTL vs. IBDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTL drawdown since its inception was -20.93%, which is greater than IBDT's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTL and IBDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTL | IBDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.93% | -17.79% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -1.03% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.38% | -3.19% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.16% | 0.00% | -7.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -4.15% | -7.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 0.22% | +0.81% |
Volatility
IBTL vs. IBDT - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL) has a higher volatility of 1.11% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) at 0.44%. This indicates that IBTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTL | IBDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 0.44% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.41% | 1.07% | +1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.50% | 1.61% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.44% | 5.07% | +2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.44% | 6.36% | +1.08% |
IBTL vs. IBDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTL has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IBDT's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBTL vs. IBDT - Dividend Comparison
IBTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than IBDT's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDT iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF | 4.54% | 4.56% | 4.67% | 4.10% | 3.25% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 3.32% | 1.47% |
IBTL iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF | 3.97% | 3.93% | 4.07% | 3.04% | 2.36% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTL and IBDT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBTL has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to IBDT (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTL dropped -20.93% vs IBDT's -17.79%.
On 3-year performance, IBDT leads with 5.76% vs 3.19% for IBTL. On fees, IBTL is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBDT has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IBDT has performed better with a 5.76% return vs 3.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBTL is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBDT.
IBDT has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.97% for IBTL.
IBTL is categorized as Government Bonds, while IBDT is Corporate Bonds. IBTL tracks ICE 2031 Maturity US Treasury Index, while IBDT tracks Bloomberg December 2028 Maturity Corporate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTL and 0.10% for IBDT.
IBDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBTL and IBDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer